Ted Rolle wrote:
>
> No, don't use int!!! Don't use ANYTHING that describes a number when
> dealing with characters. Isn't there a 'wide char' or something like that?
> I'd (for the nonce) typedef the actual word definitions to what they are
> currently, and then change the typedef when time permits.
The wide character is not portable as it can be anywhere from 8 to 32
bits deponding on the system.
Calm down. I will not directory use int. I will use a typedef like
"typedef int unichar". Don't forget that characters are after all
numbers too.
--
Kevin Atkinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/
---
Note: This message was origanlly posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
aspell-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/aspell-user
