Ram -Da As I see it, you've correctly assessed the situation and the debate and postulated the correct answers in conventional wisdom. SB has used the theoretical tools at his disposal to deal with the situation. At the cost of repetition, I like to reiterate one point. No single person matters. Even a scoundrel would make a good governor if the interests (economic, social, political) he rerpesents themselves are noble and/or pro-people. He would be shown his place otherwise. And a Mahatma would be a lousy governor if those interests are not pro-people. Individual character would not matter substantially. Conjunction of historical elements, presence of a person at the right place at the right time and the interests that I refer to elevate some persons to heroic level, say, Alexander, Napoleon, Lawrence of Arabia, Jesus Christ, Julius Ceaser.......... But the interests that they represented in their times is important. That is the reason why I was alluding to Manmohan Singh representing the interest of the Emperor overtly (come whatever may) and the Left too in effect aiding him with wrong timing of their political moves. The holier than thou Left too is representing its career interests than that of the people of India. However, I'm only saying what is paramount in their respective minds and not trying to statrt a debate on the nuke deal itself.
Uttam Kumar Borthakur --- On Thu, 10/7/08, Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Assam] Of Generals as Governors To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the world" <assam@assamnet.org> Date: Thursday, 10 July, 2008, 4:53 PM Uttam - good points. Without having read what the Bard wrote (yet). :):). I would like to weigh in a bit. The US has had generals who became really good Presidents, and has had lousy runs from Presidents who ran away from military duties ( George Bush). But that is the USA. In the examples you cite, you might notice, they were all self-appointed (some for life, like Dada Idi Amin) generals. Heck, they could have been "God" in their countries if they wanted. In India, the generals would have had to go thru the normal military channels of promotions (much like the US), hence no self-appointed demi-gods. So, would generals in general make good Governors? I think it depends on the individual in question. Its a crap-shoot of sorts. In the Indian context, and more so in the context of Assam, it will be a crucial appointment. What are the choices: Since we still have a shaky UPA govt. at the Center, they will probably appoint: (a) A general - experienced in the internal strifes and military expeditionsin the state (b) A political lackey, probably corrupt CM from Bihar/UP/MP (c) A existing or former Governor from another state (d) A political appointee to appease some coalition.. The choices aren't that great. Incidentally, would FM Sam Manekshaw made a good Governor or a Gen. Cariappa? I seriously doubt Assam will be lucky to get a Person with a good track record in problem-solving - maybe a good diplomat or a career IAS/Union Minister. I keep hearing Renuka Choudhury is great. Maybe Assam needs a woman's touch? IMHO, in Assam's case, we need a Governor who really can really feel the pulse of the state. Assam needs a person who is sensitive to the needs of the region, works hard to achieve results, and finally is someone who is willing to boldly represent Assam's needs at the Center. Some "oppose" Generals Assam as they tend to think that a general might go for a military solution for the ULFA problem (as opposed to a political solution). That is probably the crux of the debate here. BTW: Even in the US, even though voters like military service in their Presidents, they still balked at suggestions of Gen. George Patton running for office. And today (as then), Gen. Patton is one of the most respected and celebrated military officers. --Ram On 7/10/08, uttam borthakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> No, not the very same American Presidents (as they passed long time ago, >>>>>> sorry, didn't mean to be sarcastic here) would literally do that, but Generals in general could do that - be good Governors, that is. Duarte, Idi Amin, Yahaya Khan, Pinochet, Qaddafi, Musharaff, the head of the junta in Myanmar............... the list is promising. Or, it is only that Generals should be Governors of the States/provinces and not Presidents/ Head of the States? I think it is neither governor nor another person that matters. It is not even he as a person. It is the interest he represents. Like, the Indian PM seems to be eager to please his emperor than explain things to the people of India first. The Left too seems fishy with their two-timings. I do not know what package they (the Left) are going to get by showing their false braggadocio by pretending to oppose the nuke deal and at the same time allowing enough time to the supporters of the deal to garner support so that the government may not fall and the deal is ultimately through. Uttam Kumar Borthakur --- On Thu, 10/7/08, Alpana B. Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Alpana B. Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Assam] Ulfa, Sovereignty and Assam To: "A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the world" <assam@assamnet.org> Date: Thursday, 10 July, 2008, 1:36 PM > So?> "Excellent American Presidents" will be good governors for Assam!!!> What a strange logic!!!> What height of ignorance!! Could not help not to get in here again. Another example of taking things out of the context, rather, taking things ligterally - big time. No, not the very same American Presidents (as they passed long time ago, sorry, didn't mean to be sarcastic here) would literally do that, but Generals in general could do that - be good Governors, that is. "In order to make spiritual progress you must be patient like a tree and humble like a blade of grass." > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: assam@assamnet.org> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 20:48:28 -0500> Subject: Re: [Assam] Ulfa, Sovereignty and Assam> > > "Military Generals in US Army have been making excellent American > Presidents."> > So?> "Excellent American Presidents" will be good governors for Assam!!!> What a strange logic!!!> What height of ignorance!!> Rajen Barua> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Choudhary, H. N. - AMW - MUM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: "A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around the world" > <assam@assamnet.org>> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:20 AM> Subject: Re: [Assam] Ulfa, Sovereignty and Assam> > > To govern needs wisdom, courage conviction and leadership like that of > Akbar the Great. Lesser human beings can possess these qualities in small > measure. Military Generals in US Army have been making excellent American > Presidents.> Therefore your comments " military generals, lightweight in more ways than > one" are an expression of ignorance of historical facts.> > Please do not make such comments. It hurts good people.> > Regards> > Hemen N Choudhary> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9820125972> > > > -----Original Message-----> From: Chan Mahanta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 7:04 PM> To: A Mailing list for people interested in Assam from around theworld> Subject: Re: [Assam] Ulfa, Sovereignty and Assam> > Hi Alpana:> > While your genuine humility is always refreshing,> it is perhaps not all that inspiring as far as> your confusion about who would make a good> governor in Assam and the contiguous Indian> holdings.> > If you have trouble deciding whether> superannuated military generals, lightweight in> more ways than one, or spooks and sekurity-wallas> whose world view are limited by their legendary> desi-bureacratic intellectual confines, further> damaged by their reliance on force rather than> dialogue for solving social unrests and able> politicians or intellectuals willing to respond> to popular views and needs are the right fit for> a region riven by politically rooted violent> conflicts that have been going on for over half a> century; then your commitments to a democratic> ethos needs serious re-examination, don't you> think :-)?> > c-da> > > > > > > > > > At 11:52 PM -0500 7/7/08, Alpana B. Sarangapani wrote:> >IMO, it is indeed a scholarly piece, but sounds pessimistic.> >> >Some portions are beyond my understanding and> >knowledge (like who would be good as a> >governor), but as an ordinary person, I would> >like to think that this is at least the> >beginning of the peace process.> >> >Cheers!!> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >"In order to make spiritual progress you must be> >patient like a tree and humble like a blade of> >grass."> >> >> >> > > Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:20:13 -0500> To:> >assam@assamnet.org> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >Subject: Re: [Assam] Ulfa, Sovereignty and> >Assam> > Another excellent piece Baruah. Thanks> >for sharing.> > m> > > > > > > > > > > > > > At> >8:41 PM -0400 7/7/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote:> >The Telegraph (Calcutta)> >July 8,> >2008> >> > >http://www.telegraphindia.com/1080708/jsp/opinion/story_9504721.jsp#> >> >A> >CRISIS OF POLICY AND THE SOVEREIGNTY> >QUESTION> >> >Sanjib Baruah> >> >A unilateral> >ceasefire and a new governor may not be enough> >to end the> >cycle of violence and> >counter-violence in Assam, unless there is> >a> >radical renegotiation in the social contract> >between India and this> >state, writes Sanjib> >Baruah.> >> >> >Some in Assam like to see the> >unilateral ceasefire by the so-called> >Alpha> >and Charlie companies of United Liberation Front> >of Asom?s 28th> >battalion as good news.> >However, there is nothing in the history> >of> >the past two decades of the state?s> >politics to suggest that the> >state?s> >multi-faceted political crisis, of which Ulfa is> >a symptom,> >might end with new defections from> >Ulfa or, even a mutiny.> >> >A far more> >promising development may be the appointment of> >former> >chief minister of Rajasthan, Shiv> >Charan Mathur, as governor. For the> >first time> >in nearly two decades, Assam will have a> >politician as> >governor.> >> >Two other> >gubernatorial appointments in the region are> >significant.> >Sikkim?s new governor, the> >retired IAS officer, Balmiki Prasad Singh,> >is> >an old ?Northeast hand.? Unlike these two men,> >the new governor of> >Meghalaya, Ranjit Shekhar> >Mooshahary, has had a career in a> >uniformed> >all-India security service. But his> >Bodo roots makes it an> >interesting> >appointment.> >> >Governors of the> >northeastern states have more inputs in> >policymaking> >than in the less-troubled states.> >It is no coincidence that the> >primary thrust> >of our policy towards Ulfa during the tenure of> >the> >last two governors ? both military men ?> >has been military. The> >half-hearted steps> >toward negotiations were not the result> >of> >conviction on either side. They were> >gestures to satisfy Assamese> >public opinion> >that strongly favours a negotiated and> >honorable> >settlement with Ulfa.> >> >The> >outgoing governor, Ajay Singh, leaves behind a> >remarkably> >unsuccessful record of locking> >horns with Ulfa for nearly two decades.> >In the> >early Nineties, long before he became the> >governor, he> >commandeered two> >counter-insurgency operations against Ulfa as> >head of> >the Indian Army?s 4 Corps. As> >governor, he came to be associated with> >a> >hardline position of opposing talks with> >Ulfa.> >> >Singh claims in his resumé that as> >the commander of those> >counter-insurgency> >operations, he ?was given the responsibility> >of> >wiping out [the] Ulfa insurgency? and that> >he ?smashed the Ulfa> >insurgency in less than> >three months?. But that was more than> >fifteen> >years ago.> >> >While Ulfa is at a> >crossroads today, it is not because of its> >military> >reversals alone. Popular outrage at> >the killings of civilians, and a> >sense of> >hopelessness that there is no end in sight to> >the cycle of> >violence and counter-violence,> >are more important factors.> >> >There is no> >evidence that anyone knows how to use the shift> >in the> >public mood as a political opening. One> >hopes that the new> >gubernatorial appointments> >would mark a shift in the balance> >between> >military and political thinking. Even> >though Ulfa as an idea has> >always been more> >powerful than the reality, this has not made> >engaging> >with it any less> >challenging.> >> >The oft-repeated clichés about> >unemployment and underdevelopment> >creating> >conditions for recruitment by insurgent groups,> >and> >platitudes about solving the crisis of> >immigration through> >border-fencing do not give> >confidence that our decision-makers> >understand> >the sources of Ulfa?s political> >influence.> >> >The two most recent governors> >have both been highly vocal on the> >dangers of> >illegal immigration from Bangladesh. But to> >expect> >political dividends out of such> >speech-making on this> >extraordinarily> >difficult issue without> >addressing it in any substantial sense is> >to> >grossly misunderstand the nature of the> >immigration crisis and its> >relationship with> >the rise of Ulfa.> >> >Ulfa was a radical fringe> >of the Assam Movement of 1979-85. From> >the> >very beginning, it tried to distance> >itself from some of the Assam> >Movement?s> >extreme rhetoric on ?foreigners? and> >?Bangladeshis.? At the> >same time it tried to> >get propaganda value out of the> >evident> >indifference of our governmental> >institutions to this key> >Assamese> >concern.> >> >But the immigration> >crisis, for Ulfa, has never been more than a> >piece> >of evidence of what it sees as a raw> >deal that the Assamese got in the> >postcolonial> >pan-Indian dispensation.> >> >India?s political> >and bureaucratic elites inherit a memory> >of> >Partition vastly different from that of> >their counterparts in Assam.> >Few people seem> >to know that the migration from eastern Bengal> >was a> >politically explosive issue in Assam> >even as far back as the 1930s.> >Indeed, it> >shaped Assamese attitudes towards> >Partition.> >> >The flow of people from one of> >the subcontinent?s most densely> >populated> >areas to a sparsely populated region ? legally> >open to new> >settlements in colonial times ?> >did not stop with Partition. The> >erection of> >an international border did not change that> >reality.> >Indeed, from the Assamese point of> >view, the effect of Partition was> >to intensify> >the migration pressure from eastern Bengal, with> >waves of> >Hindu refugees joining in.> >> >In> >retrospect, Assam appears to have adapted to> >this demographic> >transformation rather well.> >Official predictions of the 1930s> >that> >immigration would permanently alter the> >future of Assam and destroy> >?the whole> >structure of Assamese culture and civilization?> >did not> >materialize. But it is not because the> >predicted demographic changes> >did not take> >place: they did, with profound consequences. But> >contrary> >to the fears of the colonial era,> >most East Bengali migrant Muslims> >adopted> >Assamese as their mother tongue. No one familiar> >with the> >relationship between demographic> >dynamics and civil disorder in other> >parts of> >the world would read this as a sign that> >everyone would live> >happily ever> >after.> >> >Japanese scholar Hiroshi Sato talks> >about the faultline between the> >normative> >definition of citizenship in Indian law, and the> >actual> >exercise of franchise by people ?based> >on the legitimacy of> >rudimentary documents> >rather than on the registration of> >citizenship.?> >The ?foreigners? question in> >Assam is the product of this> >faultline.> >Understood in this way, it is not> >surprising that the issue became the> >epicentre> >of a veritable political explosion in Assam in> >1979. There> >is no evidence that the ripples of> >this explosion have subsided.> >> >The power of> >Ulfa as an idea reflects a policy impasse> >of> >subcontinental proportions, showing up the> >failures of Partition> >borders and of the> >foundational ideologies of the> >post-Partition> >states. Assam?s numerous tribal> >rebellions, and evidence of candidates> >of> >mainstream political parties turning to Ulfa?s> >tacit support during> >elections, and of even> >the government relying on such support> >in> >certain situations ? relations facilitated> >by the massive corruption> >that the state has> >become known for ? outline the multi-faceted> >nature> >of the crisis. If political movements> >relate to reality, either to the> >bare facts,> >or to strivings that grow out of a reality, Ulfa> >provides> >an example of the latter.> >> >In> >Ulfa?s narrative of history, Assam lost its> >sovereignty in 1826. It> >sees itself as being> >engaged in a battle to recover that> >sovereignty.> >This reading of history has its> >elements of myth and fantasy. But as> >the> >veteran journalist, M.S. Prabhakara, points out,> >?a certain> >wistfulness and nostalgia over a> >past when Assam was a sovereign> >and> >independent political entity,? have been> >part of Assamese ?folk> >memories, literature> >and cultural and political polemics,? for a> >long> >time.> >> >To the military mindset,> >Ulfa?s insistence on discussing> >sovereignty> >might seem audacious, especially> >given the organization?s weak> >position. At the> >same time, it is hard to imagine how the> >strivings> >that animate Ulfa can be> >accommodated within the model of an> >ethnic> >peace accord ? so popular among our> >politicians and bureaucrats.> >> >The chief> >minister of Assam, Tarun Gogoi, has held out the> >Bodo> >Liberation Tigers as an example. The BLT,> >he says, is similar to Ulfa,> >but ?we sat down> >with BLT and they surrendered.... Now we have> >BLT> >members as part of our> >government.?> >> >But historically, the> >?Assamese? has not been purely an ethnic> >and> >exclusive category. If the category> >includes minorities of all stripes> >? as it> >does in Ulfa?s vision ? how can the aspirations> >of a> >territorially defined political community> >be accommodated within the> >model of an ethnic> >peace accord?> >> >The reason for Ulfa?s> >apparent intransigence on the> >sovereignty> >question may be because the> >concept provides a way of getting around> >this> >difficulty. It brings to the policy agenda the> >notion of> >renegotiating the social contract> >between India and Assam.> >> >Sovereignty talk> >does not have to take the form of the familiar> >talk> >about independence. However, compromises> >within this paradigm are> >possible only if> >constitutional reforms are part of the agenda.> >It> >might also require a willingness to relate> >foreign policy issues,> >vis-à-vis relations> >with Bangladesh, to domestic policy concerns,> >but> >in ways other than those that our security> >establishment has long> >preferred.> >> >A bold> >new political initiative to resolve Assam?s> >complex crisis must> >consider such> >options.> >> >The author is at the Centre for> >Policy Studies, New> >Delhi.> >> >> >> >> >_______________________________________________> > >assam> >mailing> >list> >assam@assamnet.org> > >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> > >> >_______________________________________________>> >assam mailing list> assam@assamnet.org>> >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> >_________________________________________________________________> >Use video conversation to talk face-to-face with Windows Live Messenger.> >http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_messenger_video_072008> >_______________________________________________> >assam mailing list> >assam@assamnet.org> >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> > > > > _______________________________________________> assam mailing list> assam@assamnet.org> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org> > > > _______________________________________________> assam mailing list> assam@assamnet.org> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org _________________________________________________________________ Use video conversation to talk face-to-face with Windows Live Messenger. http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_messenger_video_072008 _______________________________________________ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/ _______________________________________________ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org Get an email ID as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Click here http://in.promos.yahoo.com/address _______________________________________________ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org