I am not familiar with the term 'koot-torko', but in this context, could it be 
disingenuous arguments :-)?








On Aug 24, 2010, at 10:52 AM, uttam borthakur wrote:

> 
> Ram Da,
> I thought I was weighing a sort of balanced view, when I pointed out two 
> possibilities: that the rape news was either plugged or may be wholly/ 
> partially true. But you seem to have told me that I should take only one 
> view.: that rape news is true.
> While the report on Supreme Court judgment reported in the TOI can be 
> verified from the records of the Court and reports of the cases used for 
> precedents; you perhaps cannot verify the authenticity of a reporter alleging 
> rape by Kishanji or his camp followers. And if you are not too biased, you 
> surely know what 'plugging' is in journalistic term, as I remember learning 
> the term long ago from the notorious novel The Fountainhead in my teens. Does 
> that mean each and every item in a news paper has to be 'plugged'? You simply 
> cannot report that MMS has become a Naxal today; but you may always report 
> that from a reliable source you have learnt that there is going to be a 
> cabinet reshuffle. The first one would make you lose credibility, which a 
> paper like TOI cannot afford; and the second it can always report without 
> losing  credibility, as it is not verifiable. In Assam, at this moment, 
> NEWSLIVE owned by Himanta Biswa Sarma has to report Okhil Gogoi's
> meetings;  but it also publishes hearsay that everyone speaking about Sri 
> Gogoi having sold his soul to Himanta Biswa Sarma for a sum of Rs.2 crores, 
> which is not verifiable. 
> Why are you snaring me into a debate that takes us away from the core issues? 
> Your second remark is also full of holes. Yes, Kishanji may not hold a court 
> of inquiry against himself; that is why I said that if the Naxals/ Maoists 
> fail to bring the guilty (whoever it is) to book, then they will lose support 
> base in no time. Where did I go wrong? What new dimension have you added to 
> what I said, but you are giving an impression that I had told something 
> childish.
>  It has taken 23 years to reach the Supreme Court a 'question' of 
> compensation to displaced people, who had been displaced by the Government, 
> that should have been settled by the Government, which claims to represent 
> the people in a democracy.Except one with blinkers shall spread the angelic 
> message around that " look, look, it may be justice delayed, but not justice 
> denied; the beauty of the Indian judiciary that still works in this thriving 
> democracy".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ram Sarangapani assamrs at gmail.com 
> Tue Aug 24 09:35:04 IST 2010Previous message: [Assam] The Naxal/Maoist 
> Movement, Part 2?Next message: [Assam] I am not opposed to talks: ULFA 
> leaderMessages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]Dear 
> Uttam,
> 
> 
>> There may be two possibilities. (1) The story is state propaganda and (2)
> The story may be true, partially or wholly.
>> If it is a propaganda,
> 
> Ah, yes. I had plum forgotten about that distinct possibility about the TOI
> making this whole thing (no doubt egged on by the state machinery).
> 
> So, Uttam, what about the other stories (from the TOI)? Should we discount
> them...? I think, I'll just cherry pick. That suits me quite well.
> 
>> If it is true, partially or wholly, then the Naxals/ Maoists would  lose
> support if those guilty of the crimes are not brought to books and awarded
>> exemplary punishments either by their own courts,
> 
> The problem, Uttam, is that (according to the story), it is the leaders who
> are the ones committing the rapes. I am not really sure they will be really
> gung ho on some kind of court (to punish the guilty).
> 
>> BTW: 2000 farmers from Chattisgarh in the meanwhile have petitioned the
> President asking for permission to commit suicide, because of hunger.
> 
> Hunger and poverty are real issues, and I certainly think these have to be
> addressed in all seriousness.
> 
> But tell me something, why would potential suiciders (as GW Bush loved to
> say) want to take the permission from anyone.
> If the president gave her assent, would they go ahead?
> 
> Mass suicides are organized, and quite possibly lead by some political hack.
> But I do believe there are genuine cases,
> which may be in the 100s at least, and do need governmental intervention.
> 
> --Ram da
> 
> Uttam Kumar Borthakur
> 
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> assam@assamnet.org
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to