<<But what about WITHOUT FICA?>>
Simply put, the laws on religious conversion already exists. The dividing line between converting willy-nilly and FICA is the magnitude of infraction. The Constitution expressly forbids conversion by means of FICA and an Indian citizen is bound to obey the Constitution.
Personally, I believe that the very act of conversion has held implicit in the idea of superiority of one path over another, otherwise no need to convert.
KJD.
In a message dated 9/8/03 9:30:19 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Chan Mahanta
- [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court S Saikia
- RE: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Roy, Santanu
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Chan Mahanta
- [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court S Saikia
- [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Chan Mahanta
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Chan Mahanta
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Chan Mahanta
- [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Krishnendu Chakraborty
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Chan Mahanta
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court Rajen Barua
- Re: [Assam] re: conversion & supreme court KJDeka
