In a message dated 9/15/03 11:24:08 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<<Against this onslaught of attack from the West, there came Ram Mohan Roy (mind it he is called the Father of Modern India) and others who redifined Hinduism stating that Animism, Idol Worship etc are not parts of proper Hindusim.>>

The focus of this discussion is not about the faults and deficiencies of the Hindu religion. The centerstage of the debate is.......whether or not, tribals have been a part of Hinduism. The available datas clearly points in the affirmative. Gandhiji once remarked, "we were strangers to this sort of classification....animist/aborginist etc, because I know that inspite of being described as animist these tribes have, from times immemorial have been absorbed in Hinduism. They are like the indigenous medicine, of the soil, and their roots lies deep there." Anyway, what is the difference between Hindu form of worship and the tribal's animism? Hindus too worship snakes on Nag Panchami, trees on Vat Savitri and cows.

KJD.







Reply via email to