C'da,

> >  >But I realize I could be suffering from delusions of grandeur.
> > > >Is that something like 'holier than thou' ? :-)
>
> *** Tsk, tsk, Ram! Not becoming for a St. Edmunds alumnus  to fall into such
> serious confusing on the Queen's language. If you keep doing this
> the alma-mater might disavow you. Anjan must be shaking his head in
> disbelief. It would be another matter if a 'jokaisukiya' or a
> 'janjiya' or 'Collegiate Iskuliya' makes such errors -- but for a
> right proper St. Edmunds grad. ? Give us a break Ram :-).

Heh! Heh! You know me, that was a momentary lapse and the Queen's writ
doesn't have any effect this side of the pond. Further, I have already
bought immunity,  when I openly pled about my deficiencies in language
skills and old age creeping up.

BTW, I know you have been tied down :-) replying to so many frivolous
postings, but you do own me a reply fromlast week about bandhs part2.

I am copying it here for your convenience. Would love to hear your views:

C'da,

> Once again I find myself surrounded by angry Indians :-).

Heh! heh! heh!
These darn Injuns. At least we don't have too many angry chiefs :-)
I will await your response.

--Ram
********************************************
********************************************

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:45:11 -0600, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
> Ram:
> 
> I will be sure to respond, but it may be a few days before I can. I
> have one more response to make to what Dilip threw at me.
> 
> Once again I find myself surrounded by angry Indians :-).
> 
> c-da
> 
> 
> At 10:52 PM -0600 2/28/05, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
> >C'da,
> >
> >Sorry for the delay in replying.
> >
> >>  *** To "---an extent" Ram ?
> >>      What does that mean? That it maybe something nice to have.
> >>>   Why I ask is about what ever happened to civil conflict resolution
> >>  >>            mechanisms? What are the ways to exact
> >>accountability from elected
> >>  >>            bodies? Or have we given them a pass too :-)?
> >
> >I agreed with you to a certain extent -let me try and explain:
> >
> >The Indian democracy is still in its infancy (Brintain has had it for
> >a long time, and US - if considered a democracy, for over 400 years).
> >India has had it for 50+ years.
> >There have been growing pains. And development has been lopsided for
> >the first so many decades.
> >But look at India now - it is emerging as a fast growing,
> >on-the-way-to development, and with core democratic values still
> >intact.
> >The voters have a number of times voted out undesirable politcians.
> >Politcians hold office ONLY if they are voted into power, etc.
> >
> >Yes, civil conflict resolution mechanisms are still being built.
> >People and media do raise their voices when something goes awry, and
> >public opinion does get formed, and things do happen for the good.
> >
> >Its a large country with numerous problems, but worldwide prognosis if
> >you care to listen, all say that it will be one of the big economic
> >hubs in x numer of years, and that too a democratic one.
> >The bottomline is, India at its very core is democratic with all the
> >essential legal, constitutional, and political safeguards. Yes, some
> >of these are being flounted as we speak, but India realizes that, and
> >they are working slowly but surely to make things better.
> >
> >>Democracy without its essential institutions is  NOT.
> >
> >As you well know, democracy is a painful process - look at Russia, but
> >you are wrong that the essential institutions DO NOT exist in India.
> >The institutions DO exist, but do not function at 100% all the time.
> >If not, how would you account for a powerful sitting PM (Indira
> >Gandhi) loose her gaddi.
> >In India, things may work slowly for many people's taste, but in the
> >end, they do.
> >
> >>      How about reforming Indian democracy and making its institutions
> >>  functional?  Does that hurt too much to talk about
> >
> >No, I don't have a problem in this area, and no it doesn't hurt
> >(ouch!).  Of course, it is an essential function of any citizen to
> >work toward that end - to improve functionality, to speed up justice,
> >eliminate corruption at all levels etc, and lord knows, India does
> >need help in that area.
> >Responsibility of the voter DOES NOT end after electing someone to
> >office. That is just the begining. It is the responsibility of the
> >voter to make sure that those they elected to office behave. If voters
> >do not participate, politcians will more than likely take advantage -
> >whether its in India or the US.
> >
> >Can there be a better alternative?
> >
> >Of course there are alternatives - but NOT good ones for India (or
> >Assam for that matter).
> >What is your suggestion? Break-up the country?, Give Assam sovereignity?
> >Then how would you guarantee fully functioning democratic institutions
> >that you so aspire for Assam/India will ALSO exist in a separated
> >Assam or a broken-up India?
> >
> >>      Why do people have to take time off from making a living,
> >>building a nation
> >>      learning and teaching, have to go form your NGOs and what have
> >>you? Isn't
> >>      that a convoluted way to do things. What is so sacred about what does
> >  >     not work that you must hold on to, as if there is no better way?
> >
> >I think democracy is the best way. If people think its not working,
> >they would need to participate and make things better - and not throw
> >the baby with the bathwater.
> >NGOs are not novel ideas that I came up with. These have worked in
> >almost all countries (including the US) - so it boggles the mind when
> >you say they are convoluted ideas.
> >
> >>      Why do people have to take time off from making a living,
> >>building a nation
> >>      learning and teaching
> >
> >The US is a very good example. Slavery was eliminated BECAUSE people
> >participated. Women's sufferage, consumer protection laws, etc, etc
> >all happened because people participated, and wanted to BUILD a
> >nation.  That is why, C'da.
> >
> >Now, I have answered all your questions to the best of my abilities,
> >but here is one for you, I hope you will provide us with some answers,
> >in simple terms :-).
> >
> >Practically speaking, India will (or cannot) give away Assam because
> >some people want it. It is politically, economically, (or threat from
> >external forces) an impossibility for India to do so. The only way,
> >maybe is for a third country to take Assam by force from India. What
> >are the chances in that?
> >
> >Now, given that situation, what is your prescription for Assam?
> >(a) continue with the insurgency to get Assam free of India's shackles.
> >(b) work with the Delhiwallas to get what Assam well deserves
> >(c) do nothing, let providence dictate
> >
> >I am just listing a few here, you could ofcourse come-up with something else.
> >However, if you STILL think that Assam will be a free nation in the
> >near future, please show us how that will be accomplished?
> >
> >Let us be practical here and set passions aside.
> >
> >You know what, C'da, I am going to keep a very open mind about this.
> >If you or anyone else can really convince me, I will join you in your
> >crusade (without a peep :-)
> >
> >the best,
> >---Ram
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:41:04 -0600, Chan Mahanta <cmahanta at charter.net> 
> >wrote:
> >>  >I will agree with to some extent here.
> >>
> >>  *** To "---an extent" Ram ?
> >>
> >>      What does that mean? That it maybe something nice to have. But since
> >>      GoI is incapable of doing anything to establish these institutions in
> >>      the country, let us not pay too much emphasis on it ?
> >>
> >>      Democracy without its essential institutions is  NOT.
> >>
> >>      Why are you so afraid to acknowledge that ?
> >>
> >>
> >>  >  >So, now its time to adopt new and
> >>  >more potent tactics.
> >>
> >>      How about reforming Indian democracy and making its institutions
> >>  functional?
> >>      Does that hurt too much to talk about? Can there be a better
> >>alternative?
> >>      Why do people have to take time off from making a living,
> >>building a nation
> >>      learning and teaching, have to go form your NGOs and what have
> >>you? Isn't
> >>      that a convoluted way to do things. What is so sacred about what does
> >>      not work that you must hold on to, as if there is no better way?
> >>
> >>  *** I can't believe how you guys have painted yourselves into a
> >>  corner, rendering yourselves incapable of acknowledging the most
> >>  fundamental of democratic governance.
> >>
> >>  If an uninterested third party is watching these exchanges probably
> >>  are wondering how unreal we are.
> >>
> >>  c-da :-)
> >>
> >>
> >>  At 2:08 PM -0600 2/28/05, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
> >>  >C'da,
> >>  >>         ** Are you suggesting that it is time for one more AGITATION ?
> >>  >>            More bandhs perhaps :-)?
> >>  >
> >>  >*****And my suggestion was (previous post) ----
> >>  >
> >>  >>  >And how can they do this without resorting to bandhs, agitations or
> >>  >>  >insurgencies etc? They can form public awareness groups, which should
> >>  >>  >comprise of the cross-section of the people. Such groups can actually
> >>  >>  >weild political power and make sure that whatever the GOA does is in
> >>  >>  >the best interest of Assam, and make sure that GOA representatives in
> >>  >>  >Delhi also do likewise.
> >>  >****
> >>  >
> >>  >>            Why I ask is about what ever happened to civil
> >>conflict resolution
> >>  >>            mechanisms? What are the ways to exact
> >>accountability from elected
> >>  >>            bodies? Or have we given them a pass too :-)?
> >  > >>
> >>  >
> >>  >I will agree with to some extent here.
> >>  >
> >>  >However, the people of Assam, more than any other state, have shown
> >>  >their tenacity to object when required by mass demonstrations,
> >>  >strikes, bandhs etc. etc.
> >>  >Imagine to get get mass support in a place like Rajasthan or Kerala
> >  > >for a good cause. The masses in Assam have always given full support
> >>  >to leaders, inspite of the fact these leaders have let them down a
> >>  >number of times.
> >>  >
> >>  >I have no doubt, that if these same people REALLY wanted to hold
> >>  >ministers or bureaucrats accountable, they could also come together
> >>  >enmasse and get things righted.
> >>  >
> >>  >Of course, I do not suggest they become insurgents, or have a bandh at
> >>  >the drop of a hat, but to form citizen groups, whose only interests
> >>  >are the interests of Assam. And make sure ministers are not reelected
> >>  >after a bad performance.
> >>  >
> >>  >Strong PACs if you will, will yield results. Today, in many parts of
> >>  >India (even in Assam), various groups have formed - ie civil
> >>  >liberties, humanitarian, SPCA types. These groups have had effects on
> >>  >public policy, especially with the help of the media.
> >>  >
> >>  >Bandhs, insurgencies, strikes, etc have been tried for 25 + years.
> >>  >They have not worked, have they? So, now its time to adopt new and
> >>  >more potent tactics.
> >>  >
> >>  >--Ram
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >
> >>  >On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:34:26 -0600, Chan Mahanta
> >><cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
> >>  >>  Ram:
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  >A good point, but seriously flawed, nevetheless.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >The people (mostly rural) of Assam/NE have launched 3 or 4 major
> >>  >>  >agitations that has caught worldwide attention.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  *** OK, let us look into this.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  I don't know which are the three or four major agitations you refer
> >>  >>  to, but I will go along with you on that in order not to digress:
> >>  >>
> >>  >>         ** Are you suggesting that it is time for one more AGITATION ?
> >>  >>            More bandhs perhaps :-)?
> >>  >>            Why I ask is about what ever happened to civil
> >>conflict resolution
> >>  >  >           mechanisms? What are the ways to exact accountability
> >>  >from elected
> >>  >>            bodies? Or have we given them a pass too :-)?
> >>  >>
> >>  >>         ** What led to those agitations?
> >>  >>
> >>  >>         ** And what exactly did the people of Assam get from what they
> >>  >>            achieved as a result of those 4 or 5 agitations?
> >>  >>
> >>  >>             Can those be acceptable standard of results ?
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  c-da
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  At 12:22 PM -0600 2/27/05, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
> >>  >>  >C'da,
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  2: The other crucial mistake you keep making :-), is equating 
> >> Assam
> >>  >>  >>  Govts. to the people of Assam. Just because they go vote means
> >>  >>  >>  little. An uninformed or misinformed or manipulated polity cannot
> >>  >>  >>  make an effective democracy.
> >>  >  > >
> >>  >>  >A good point, but seriously flawed, nevetheless.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >The people (mostly rural) of Assam/NE have launched 3 or 4 major
> >>  >>  >agitations that has caught worldwide attention.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >Do you mean to tell us that this polity is uninformed, and impotent?
> >>  >>  >How could such a polity (as you described) be capable of such
> >>  >>  >large-scale movements?
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >When the people of Assam are given good leadership, they can and have
> >>  >>  >made their voices clear, and, the powers that be, have yielded.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >But, what Barua points out, is that, EVEN though the people have
> >>  >>  >proven time & again that they have the POWER and CAPACITY to launch
> >>  >>  >these major agitations, they have somehow given a pass to the GOA or
> >>  >>  >GOI.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >Basically, just ignored what the GOA/GOI is doing or not doing. They
> >>  >>  >seem to have this sense of sheer apathy, totally uninterested in
> >>  >>  >things that are paramount for the development of Assam.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >So, whats the solution here? I think (correct me if I am wrong,
> >>  >>  >Barua), what Barua is hinting at is that people hold some serious
> >>  >>  >accountability from the GOI/GOA.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >Like in the case why the GOA returns money unspent (for
> >>  >>  >infrastructure) every year to the Center?
> >  > >>  >The GOA may, in all fairness, have some excuse, but what are they?
> >>  >>  >Why are the people NOT asking? whats wrong?
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >If these same people are NOT willing to question the GOA, then why do
> >>  >>  >they complain about the Center ignoring Assam?
> >  > >>  >I can picture the Delhi wallahs thinking  - 'They wanted extra 
> > funds,
> >>  >>  >so we allocated, and they keep returning the money back'. Maybe its
> >>  >>  >better to allocate the money to some sate like UP?
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >And how can they do this without resorting to bandhs, agitations or
> >>  >>  >insurgencies etc? They can form public awareness groups, which should
> >>  >>  >comprise of the cross-section of the people. Such groups can actually
> >>  >>  >weild political power and make sure that whatever the GOA does is in
> >>  >>  >the best interest of Assam, and make sure that GOA representatives in
> >>  >>  >Delhi also do likewise.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >--Ram
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:16:33 -0600, Chan Mahanta
> >>  >><cmahanta at charter.net> wrote:
> >>  >>  >>  You make a very good point Rajen.
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  The only problems I see in your argument are:
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  1: The fact of Assam Govts. past and present 'working within the
> >>  >>  >>  system' that you good folks so ardently support preserving :-),
> >>  >>  >>  disabling them from demanding international price for its crude.
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  For if they challenge the system that create them and sustain 
> >> them,
> >>  >>  >>  they cannot exist.
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  2: The other crucial mistake you keep making :-), is equating 
> >> Assam
> >>  >>  >>  Govts. to the people of Assam. Just because they go vote means
> >>  >>  >>  little. An uninformed or misinformed or manipulated polity cannot
> >>  >>  >>  make an effective democracy. You know that well, but do not 
> >> consider
> >>  >>  >>  in your arguments. For if it did, the system of exacting
> >>  >>  >>  accountability would have worked, that consequences would have
> >>  >>  >  > mattered, and Indian society would not be where it is today.
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  c
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  PS:
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >  >Part of this GOI invests
> >>  >>  >>  >in Gujarat and part in Chennai, and the rest, at present
> >>  >>Manmohon Singh and
> >>  >>  >>  >Sonia Gandhi distributes among themselves
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  *** Comments like these do not add any value to  your points. Just
> >>  >>  >>  thought I would point it out :-). Those are expressions of extreme
> >>  >  > >  > frustration, that's all.
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  At 12:33 AM -0600 2/27/05, Barua25 wrote:
> >>  >>  >>  >Chandan:
> >>  >>  >>  >I know you would not like my Assam Bundh economy for the
> >>  >>  >>Bangladesh fence. I
> >>  >>  >>  >know you don't like to discuss any problems for Assam till
> >>  >>the day when GOI
> >>  >>  >>  >will give the key of sovereignty of Assam..
> >>  >>  >>  >But unfortunately we donot want to wait that long, and I have 
> >> more
> >>  >>  >>  >economical news for you.
> >>  >>  >>  >This is another way how the Assamese can build a fence on the
> >>  >>border: From
> >>  >>  >>  >its oil.
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >At present, Assam produces about 18 Million bbl oil per year
> >>  >>(my estimate).
> >>  >>  >>  >The present price of oil is about $50/bbl. So Assam earns
> >>for its big
> >>  >  > >>  >brother GOI, about $900 million dollars per year. (Part of
> >>  >this GOI invests
> >>  >>  >>  >in Gujarat and part in Chennai, and the rest, at present
> >>  >>Manmohon Singh and
> >>  >>  >>  >Sonia Gandhi distributes among themselves!!!).
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >All Assam need to do is to demand that at least 10% of
> >>that money (in
> >>  >>  >>  >addition to its present royalty) be kept in a separate Worl
> >>  >>Bank fund to
> >>  >>  >>  >build a fence on the Bangladesh border. That way, every year
> >>  >>Assam would
> >>  >>  >>  >have got about $90 million for the fence. This is equal to
> >>  >>about Rs. 400
> >>  >>  >>  >Crores a year. If Assam does not know how to build a fence,
> >>  >>they can always
> >>  >>  >>  >ask the Israelis.
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >Now why Assam does not do it? Don't say GOI is treating
> >>Assam like a
> >>  >>  >>  >stepchild?
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >Rajen Barua
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >----- Original Message -----
> >>  >>  >>  >From: "Chan Mahanta" <cmahanta at charter.net>
> >  > >>  >>  >To: "Barua25" <barua25 at hotmail.com>; <assam at 
> > pikespeak.uccs.edu>
> >>  >>  >>  >Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 10:06 AM
> >>  >>  >>  >Subject: Re: [Assam] Is Assam, the Land of Bandhs?
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >
> >  > >>  >>  >>  Rajen:
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >That is about 900 kilometer of fencing the Bangladesh border
> >>  >>  >>a year if we
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >estimate that 1 Km of fencing will cost 1 croes of Rs.
> >>  >>Looking at the
> >>  >>  >>  >map, I
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >donot think the Bangladesh-Assam border is in fact that long.
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  *** You finally explained why GoI is derelict in its
> >>duty to protect
> >>  >>  >>  >>  the borders: Assam Bandhs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  You are getting too upset again my friend. Take it
> >>easy. I am sure
> >>  >>  >>  >>  Assm Netters understand and respect your sentiments,
> >>even without
> >>  >>  >>  >>  having to be presented with such arguments :-).
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  c
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  At 5:54 PM -0600 2/21/05, Barua25 wrote:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >  > Bandhs cost Assam 900 cr a year
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >That is about 900 kilometer of fencing the Bangladesh border
> >>  >>  >>a year if we
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >estimate that 1 Km of fencing will cost 1 croes of Rs.
> >>  >>Looking at the
> >>  >>  >>  >map, I
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >donot think the Bangladesh-Assam border is in fact that long.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Barua
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >----- Original Message -----
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >From: "Ram Sarangapani" <rsassam at gmail.com>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >To: <assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Cc: "Barua25" <barua25 at hotmail.com>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 8:57 AM
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Subject: Re: [Assam] Is Assam, the Land of Bandhs?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Here is a Rediff.com article (2003) of how much Assam
> >>  >>  >>loses in bandhs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Read on, its interesting. Wonder what it be in today's Rs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  _________________________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  >  > >>  Bandhs cost Assam 900 cr a year
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Vinayak Ganapathy in Guwahati | March 26, 2003 23:03 IST
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  That Assam and other north eastern states are notorious
> >>  >>  >>for bandhs and
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  strikes for even minor, unimportant reasons, is a
> >>  >>well-documented
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  fact. But no effort was made so far to quantify the
> >>  >>monteray losses
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  that the states suffer due to these bandhs. Now
> >>thanks to the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Federation of Industries and Commerece of North Eastern
> >>  >>  >>Region, there
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  is some idea of the staggering losses suffered in the 
> >> state.
> >>  >  > >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Assam loses an estimated Rs 900 crore annually because of
> >>  >>  >>bandhs, the
> >>  >>  >  > >>  >>  FINER study says. The study covered  bandhs in Assam from
> >>  >>  >April 2001
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  to March 2002.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  There were nine statewide bandhs, 13 regional bandhs 
> >> (Upper
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Assam/Lower Assam and central Assam) and 36 district
> >>  >>bandhs during
> >>  >>  >>  >  > >>  this period.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  "A daylong bandh means a loss of Rs 41.14 crore and
> >>  >>poor states like
> >>  >>  >  > >>  >>  Assam cannot afford this luxury," FINER president,
> >>  >>Abhijit Baruah,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  said. He appealed to all organisations to opt for
> >>other ways of
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  registering their protest against any injustice.
> >>  >  > >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Citing an example of how the government incurs losses
> >>  >>during bandhs,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  the report says a single bandh can cost the exchequer Rs
> >>  >>  >>20 crore. The
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  government allocates Rs 410.95 crore towards salaries of
> >>  >>  >>its employees
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  per month but loses crucial mandays because of bandhs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  The worst affected sectors are mining and quarrying,
> >>  >>manufacturing,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  transport and communication, hotel, banking and public
> >  > >>  >>administration.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  The report also states that the younger generation,
> >>  >>especially those
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  born after 1979, has been deprived of celebrating
> >  > >>Independence and
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Republic Day for the last 23 years due to bandhs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  "Apart from other factors contributing to the economic
> >>  >>  >>backwardness of
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  the state, the frequent bandhs called by various
> >>  >>organisations in
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  different parts of the state during the last few years
> >>  >>are very much
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  responsible for the tardy growth of domestic income of
> >>  >>the state.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Assam is now a relatively poor and economically
> >>  >>backward state as
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  compared to other states of the country. The Economic
> >>  >>Survey showed
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  that in respect of per capita income in 2001, the
> >>  >>status of Assam is
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  27th out of the 29 states of the country, with only
> >>  >>Orissa and Bihar
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  behind," Baruah said.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  ____
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:04:25 -0500, Prasenjit Chetia
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  <prasenjit.chetia at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > When privatised the same accountant will run to
> >>office even of
> >>  >>  >>  >bandhs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > It is a mixture of individual attitude and GOI 
> >> promotion.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > Non-Cooperation after all was a tool through which we 
> >> won
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > Independence. The success of bandhs lies in the
> >>  >>attitude and sense
> >>  >>  >>  >of
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > judgement of the public. It works, no matter why;
> >>  >>that's why there
> >>  >>  >>  >are
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >  > > so many bandhs. And the layman is always short sighted.
> >>  >>  >>Why do the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > learned keep quiet too ?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > Prasenjit
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:07:50 -0600, Barua25
> >>  >><barua25 at hotmail.com>
> >>  >>  >>  >wrote:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > I will tel you how some other people like the bundh:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > (A) I asked a Jorhat shop keeper how much they are
> >>  >>affected by
> >>  >>  >>  >these
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >bundhs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > He said. Are you kidding? We like it. This is why:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Mine is a grocery shop. If I close for a day, I gain 
> >> the
> >>  >>  >>  >following:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > No 1) I don't have to pay my 3 shop keepers
> >>for that day.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > No2) I get one day's 'suti'. I can work in my home.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > No3) In fact I don't incur any loss in sales too.
> >>  >>Because, the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >customers
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > will buy everything they need on the next day anyway.
> >>  >>  >>It does not
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >matter if
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > they buy it on Monday or Tuesday to me.  It does
> >>  >>not affect my
> >>  >>  >>  >monthly
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >sales
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > at all.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > (B) Now listen to why big companies like Oil India
> >>  >>  >>love it? (They
> >>  >  > >>  >>  >won't say
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > they love it though).
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > One senior accountant in Oil India explained to me.
> >>  >>  >>"Mr Barua you
> >>  >>  >>  >  > >won't
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > believe how much the comany saves in one day's bundh?"
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > I asked how?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > He said bundh means, companies thousnads of
> >>  >>contractors buses to
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >worksites
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > are stopped which means the company does not have to
> >>  >>  >>pay anything
> >>  >>  >>  >for
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >that
> >>  >>  >  > >>  >>  > > day to the bus contractors. He estimated that in
> >>  >>10 days bundh,
> >>  >>  >>  >the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >campany
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > save so many (I forgot the figure) in such
> >>saving. Plus, the
> >>  >>  >>  >Medical
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >is
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > closed which means additional savings.
> >>  >  > >>  >>  >>  > > I asked, what about oil production. Does not OIL
> >  > >loose revenue.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Oh, that is taken care of by GOI. They cannot stop
> >>  >>essential oil
> >>  >>  >  > >>  >production.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > So we get our revenue anyway.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >  > >>  >>  >>  >>  > > What I found out was that the bundh affects the
> >>  >>small (mostly
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Assamese)
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > contractors, the private workers (mostly Assamese)
> >>  >>  >>and the public
> >>  >>  >>  >  > >(mostly
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Assamese).
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > For everybody else, bundh is a boon in the land of
> >>  >>'lahe lahe'.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Another thing. It is very easy to announce a bundh
> >>  >>in Assam. If
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >someone
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > telephone the Newspaper office that we are such
> >>  >>and such from
> >>  >>  >>  >ULFA
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >and we
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > are announcing a bundh on such and such day please
> >>  >>publish the
> >>  >>  >>  >news.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Hobo Diok, the answer will come..
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > That is all. The rest of the bundh is done by the news
> >>  >>  >>media. They
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >will
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > publishize everywhere that on such and such day ULFA
> >>  >>  >>has announced
> >>  >>  >>  >a
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Bundh.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > There is no ULFA to monitor the bundh and none
> >>  >>evebn to verify.
> >>  >>  >>  >But
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > bundh will happen very punctually as if everybody were
> >>  >>  >>waiting for
> >>  >>  >>  >it.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > I say way to go AASU and ULFA.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Hobo Diok.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Joi Ai Oxom
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Barua.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > ----- Original Message -----
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > From: "Ram Sarangapani" <rsassam at gmail.com>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > To: <assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 11:06 PM
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Subject: [Assam] Is Assam, the Land of Bandhs?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Among other things, Assam, it seems has
> >>become the land of
> >>  >>  >>  >bandhs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Every political group, student body, karmachari
> >>  >>  >>unions call for
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > frequent bandhs.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > This month there has already been one bandh on
> >>  >>the 14th, now
> >>  >>  >>  >here is
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > another one. (i may have missed one or two here
> >>  >>and there).
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > While these different groups may have legitimate
> >>  >>  >>grievances, it
> >>  >>  >>  >does
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > seem 'nijor bhorit khutar maara' attitude.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > I am not sure if anyone has calculated the
> >>  >>tremendous loss to
> >>  >>  >>  >the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > economy at each bandh. How much do these cost the
> >>  >>  >>state in terms
> >>  >>  >>  >of
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > money, productivity, education & commerce?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > The other question is, does a call for bandh
> >>  >>actually resolve
> >>  >>  >>  >any of
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > the grievances for which the bandh is called for?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > DD brought up the story of how Govt. employees enjoy
> >>  >>  >>a 'bandh'.
> >>  >>  >>  >But
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > what about the rest of the populace.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Either they have become immune to such calls,
> >>  >>and take such
> >>  >>  >>  >calls as
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >a
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > day off, or they just helpless? Do people think
> >>  >>only in the
> >>  >>  >>  >short
> >>  >  > >>  >>  >run?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Is the long term too bleak, so they live for
> >>the present?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > I don't know the answers to these, but I do know
> >>  >>for a state
> >>  >>  >>  >that is
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >  > > > > struggling on many different fronts, the last thing
> >>  >>  >>Assam needs
> >>  >>  >>  >is
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > being cut off at the knees every  time a bandh
> >>  >>is called. In
> >>  >>  >>  >fact,
> >  > >>  >>  >>  >its
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > tantamount of doing the state no service at all.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Does anyone have any stats on how these bandhs
> >>  >>  >>affect the state,
> >  > >>  >>  >and
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > how many Assam averages on a yearly basis?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Anyway, here is a news itel from the Tribune, about
> >>  >  > >>yet another
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >bandh.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > --Ram
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > ________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Adivasi body calls Assam bandh today
> >>  >>  >  > >>  >>  > > > By A Staff Reporter
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >  GUWAHATI, Feb 20 - The All Adivasi Students'
> >>  >>Association of
> >>  >>  >>  >Assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > (AASAA) has given a call for a 12-hour Assam
> >>  >>bandh tomorrow
> >>  >>  >>  >  > >demanding
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > scheduled tribe status for the Adivasi
> >>  >>community. In a release
> >>  >>  >>  >here
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > today, Justin Lakra and David Horo, the president
> >>  >>  >>and assistant
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > general secretary respectively of the AASAA, said
> >>  >>  >>that over the
> >>  >>  >  > >>  >years,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > the Congress had been betraying the Adivasi people
> >>  >>  >>on the issue
> >>  >>  >>  >of
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > granting the status of scheduled tribes. The
> >>  >>release said that
> >>  >>  >>  >the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Congress Government is also not concerned about
> >>  >>the problems
> >>  >>  >>  >faced
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >by
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > the tea labourers.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > The AASAA said that the Congress Government,
> >>  >>just before the
> >>  >>  >>  >Moran
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > by-polls, promised to give appointments to 80
> >>  >>youths of tea
> >>  >>  >>  >tribes,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > but the promise was never fulfilled. During the
> >>  >>  >>finalisation of
> >>  >>  >>  >the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > boundary of the Bodoland Territorial Autonomous
> >>  >>Council also,
> >>  >>  >>  >the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Government never tried to protect the interests
> >>  >>of the Adivasi
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > community.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:31:59 +0530, Babul Gogoi
> >>  >>  >>  ><bgogoi at gmail.com>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >wrote:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:41:09 -0600, Ram 
> >> Sarangapani
> >>  >>  >>  >>  ><rsassam at gmail.com>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > wrote:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > What do netters think? Would netters like to
> >>  >>  >>add/delete from
> >>  >>  >>  >the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >list
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > here?
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > --Ram
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > A Few Tips to AASU
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > The All Assam Students Union may regain its lost
> >>  >>  >>popularity
> >>  >>  >>  >if
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >it
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > takes a decision on the following points:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > a) To give up the idea of forming the Asom Sena,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > b) Give up Assam bandh/local bandh calls for
> >>  >>the next few
> >>  >>  >>  >years,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > c) Opposes all bandh calls given by
> >>other parties to
> >>  >>  >>  >facilitate
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >the
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > students to concentrate on studies,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > d) Creates village-level task forces to see
> >>  >>that academic
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >atmosphere
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > in educational institutions is properly
> >>  >>  >>maintained, teachers
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >attend
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > classes by giving up politics and private
> >>  >>  >>business concerns,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >courses
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > are completed before the examinations and all
> >>  >>  >>classes start
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > immediately after declaration of the results.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > e) Raise funds for the poor schools to buy
> >  > >>Computers, etc.,
> >>  >  > >>  >>  >instead of
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > political expenses.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > Prasanna Kumar Sharma,
> >  > >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > 3, Narikalbari, 2nd by lane,
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > Guwahati-24.
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > _______________________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > Assam mailing list
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > Assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>  >  > >>  >>  >>  > > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > --
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > Babul Gogoi
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > http://xguy2k.blogspot.com
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > _______________________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > Assam mailing list
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > Assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>  >>  >  > >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > _______________________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Assam mailing list
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >  > > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>  >>  >  > >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > _______________________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Assam mailing list
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >  > >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > --
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > Prasenjit Chetia
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  > Atlanta, GA
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Assam mailing list
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >_______________________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Assam mailing list
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  >>  >>  >  > >http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  >>  >>  >>  >http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  >>  >>  Assam mailing list
> >>  >>  >>  Assam at pikespeak.uccs.edu
> >>  >>  >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>  >>  Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  >>  >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  >>  >>  To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  >>  >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>  >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>
> >  >
> 
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Previous message: [Assam] Re: Bandhs Part 2 
Next message: [Assam] More on Patil's definition of Assamese - AT letter 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Assam mailing list







On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:27:36 -0600, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> O' Ram:
> 
> 
> >BTW: Are you annoyed by mine (or Barua's postings)?. I would not think so.
> 
> *** Far be it for me than to be annoyed by your or anybody else's
> postings. And you guessed it right about my attitudes about them.
> 
> I was merely responding to Rajen's clearly expressed wishes :-).
> 
> 
> >  >But I realize I could be suffering from delusions of grandeur.
> >
> >Is that something like 'holier than thou' ? :-)
> 
> *** Tsk, tsk, Ram! Not becoming for a St. Edmunds alumnus  to fall into such
> serious confusing on the Queen's language. If you keep doing this
> the alma-mater might disavow you. Anjan must be shaking his head in
> disbelief. It would be another matter if a 'jokaisukiya' or a
> 'janjiya' or 'Collegiate Iskuliya' makes such errors -- but for a
> right proper St. Edmunds grad. ? Give us a break Ram :-).
> 
> c-da
> 
> 
> At 9:59 AM -0600 3/4/05, Ram Sarangapani wrote:
> >C'da,
> >
> >*** But I would shut up anyway, if it bothers the majority of Netters.
> >Why don't you take a poll, and if you a would all rather have me shut
> >up, I will be pleased to comply. Because I really don't enjoy causing
> >distress to my fellow men by talking about unpleasant truths they
> >would just as soon not hear about.
> >****
> >
> >Heh! Heh!  Let me butt in here a bit. Nobody need to 'shut up' and
> >there is absolutely no need for a poll. I think both you and Barua
> >have valuable contributions to offer, and netters on the whole,
> >benefit, whether you both know it or not.
> >
> >Inspite of divergent views, the goals are the same, I presume. So, I
> >say let the discussions continue. People should be able to voice their
> >thru feelings without let or hinderance.
> >
> >>  The only reason I continue to keep doing it is because I have this feeling
> >>  that even though my views annoy the most vocal of Assam Netters to no end,
> >
> >I am pretty vocal here, but let me say this - I not the least bit
> >'annoyed' by anyone's
> >posting. In fact, I rather enjoy divergent views. Being annoyed is not
> >on my list.
> >
> >BTW: Are you annoyed by mine (or Barua's postings)?. I would not think so.
> >
> >>But I realize I could be suffering from delusions of grandeur.
> >
> >Is that something like 'holier than thou' ? :-)
> >
> >But, please, let the discussions continue, isn't that the whole
> >purpose of the Net. As long as we don't get into fist fights and
> >brawls, we are fine :-), :-).
> >
> >--Ram
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:36:09 -0600, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>  At 12:24 AM -0600 3/4/05, Barua25 wrote:
> >>  Chandan:
> >>  If we may ask you back, what is your solution?
> >>  Or none?
> >>
> >>
> >>  *** Rajen:  I spoke of what needs to be done, many times. If you missed 
> >> it,
> >>  I don't know what I can say that will register.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  If 'None', then that itself calls for you to shut up.
> >>
> >>
> >>  *** But I would shut up anyway, if it bothers the majority of Netters. Why
> >>  don't you take a poll, and if you a would all rather have me shut up, I 
> >> will
> >>  be pleased to comply. Because I really don't enjoy causing distress to my
> >>  fellow men by talking about unpleasant truths they would just as soon not
> >>  hear about.
> >>
> >>  The only reason I continue to keep doing it is because I have this feeling
> >>  that even though my views annoy the most vocal of Assam Netters to no end,
> >>  there is a whole lot of others who might remain silent, but do like to
> >>  listen to what I have to say. But I realize I could be suffering from
> >>  delusions of grandeur. So you will do all a favor, if you can put an end 
> >> to
> >>  it once and for all with a poll, even if it is only an unscientific one. I
> >>  am not looking for you to hire Gallup or Zogby.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  Because we are looking for solutions here.
> >>
> >>  *** I noticed Rajen. And I offered my views. You reject it as an 
> >> anti-Indian
> >>  ploy.  It is your turn to offer your solutions.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  We all know the problems.
> >>  If you are telling the ppeople of Assam their problems, you are not 
> >> telling
> >>  them anything new. They all know their problems.
> >  >
> >>
> >>  *** Am I in an echo chamber here? Where did I hear those before?
> >>
> >>  You are sooo smart Rajen. Nice try, but doesn't fly :-).
> >>
> >>  Take care.
> >>
> >>  c
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  Rajen Barua, Houston
> >>  ----- Original Message -----
> >>  From: Chan Mahanta
> >>  To: Anjan K. Nath ; Barua25 ; [email protected]
> >  > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 8:58 PM
> >>  Subject: Re: [Assam] Re: Credibility Of MoWR!!!
> >>
> >>  Hi Anjan:
> >>
> >>
> >>  > If we are given the franchise to elect our legislators, why are we 
> >> content
> >>  to >sit back and watch the non-performance of the elected rather than take
> >>  positive >steps to correct our initial mistakes (of electing the wrong
> >>  people).
> >>
> >>
> >>  *** I know you are younger than me, but still, you have seen govts. come 
> >> and
> >>  govts. go in Assam and in India. Question is what positive changes have 
> >> you
> >>  seen with the turnovers?
> >>
> >>  You tell  me and I will shut the heck up :-).
> >>
> >>  All of you good folks, who speak glowingly of and never forget to
> >>  demonstrate to the world your fealty to and admiration of democracy as
> >>  manifested by 'elekshuns'. That is fine to show what good folks you are.No
> >>  doubt you are a few cuts above the not-so-good folks of Assam. But that is
> >>  not the point. I am not questioning your goodness. Question is how on 
> >> earth
> >>  do the not-so-good folks folks of Assam who elect the non-performers to
> >>  govern them,accountable? And how on earth do the
> >>  better-than-the-Assam-folks,  Indians hold their central govts. 
> >> accountable?
> >>
> >>
> >>  You guys show me something halfway realistic, I will join you and Rajen 
> >> and
> >>  Ram
> >>  and all the other Indians and sing your praises. But I take a very dim 
> >> view
> >>  of people who can't see what sits on their faces :-).
> >>
> >>  Take care,
> >>
> >>  c
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  At 8:58 AM +0800 3/4/05, Anjan K. Nath wrote:
> >>  Rajen,
> >>
> >>  How very true.  If we are given the franchise to elect our legislators, 
> >> why
> >>  are we content to sit back and watch the non-performance of the elected
> >>  rather than take positive steps to correct our initial mistakes (of 
> >> electing
> >>  the wrong people).
> >>
> >>  As I have said a few times too, we should try and help our people and NOT
> >>  simply be arm-chair critics.
> >>
> >>  How would you like to join the North-East-India forum.  We have a lot more
> >>  intersting and positive discussions going on.  Your contributions would
> >>  definitely help.
> >>
> >>  Anjan
> >>  ----- Original Message -----
> >>  From: Barua25
> >>  To: [email protected] ; Chan Mahanta
> >>
> >>  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; D K Mishra
> >>  Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 12:53 AM
> >>  Subject: Re: [Assam] Re: Credibility Of MoWR!!!
> >>
> >>  Chandan:
> >>  I see Chandan Mahanta, a NRA, shouting in the net and trying to make GOI
> >>  accountable.
> >>  What we need is the people of Assam to hold both GOA and GOI accountable 
> >> for
> >>  their lapses and not to let them go.
> >>  That is what Ram and I have been shouting for in the net.
> >>  Are you willing to join us in trying to help people of Assam do that?
> >>  That is why I asked you in my last mail, what point you are trying to make
> >>  by blaming the system.
> >>
> >>  We have 2 options.
> >>  We can shout and try to make point
> >>  or
> >>  We can try to help people of Assam.
> >>  I am for the later.
> >>  Rajen
> >>
> >>
> >>  ----- Original Message -----
> >>  From: Chan Mahanta
> >>  To: [email protected]
> >>  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; D K Mishra
> >>  Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 7:26 AM
> >>  Subject: [Assam] Re: Credibility Of MoWR!!!
> >>
> >>  For those who might be interested in holding their governments 
> >> accountable.
> >>
> >>
> >>  cm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  At 12:14 AM +0600 3/3/05, D K Mishra wrote:
> >>  The data about irigation in different states , as provided by MoWR are
> >>  fake and misleading. I can say this on the authority of data supplied by
> >>  WRD of Govt. of Bihar. The annual reports of GoB suggets that,
> >>
> >>  Major
> >>  irrigation projects in the state (with command areas in excess of 10,000
> >>  hectares) include the Kosi and Gandak in North Bihar, and the Sone canal
> >>  network in South Bihar. There are a number of medium-sized schemes,
> >>  defined as those with commands between 2,000 and 10,000 hectares, and
> >>  hundreds of minor irrigation projects. However, as of 2003, irrigation
> >>  potential (area connected to the irrigation network) was only 2.8
> >  > million hectares and the area actually receiving water from the networks
> >>
> >>
> >>  was limited to 1.6 million hectares.
> >>
> >>  Scrutiny of records show that
> >>  both irrigation potential and actual irrigation (area receiving water)
> >  > increased in the state until 1990 when it attained its peak of 2.148
> >>  million hectares after which actual irrigation saw a steady decline even
> >>  as potential irrigation continued to rise. Between 1990 and 2000 (when
> >>  the state was bifurcated into Bihar and Jharkhand), there was additional
> >>  potential irrigation of 113,000 hectares but actual irrigation fell by
> >>  653,000 hectares. The area irrigated by surface networks has stabilized
> >>  around 1.6 million hectares for the past ten years. Considering that
> >>  404,000 hectares was under irrigation in Bihar at the time of
> >>  Independence in August 1947, the increase in actual irrigation of 1.2
> >>  million acres over the past 56 years is not a noteworthy achievement. At
> >>  that rate of average
> >>   growth of actual irrigation, it will take about
> >>  230 years to achieve the irrigation targets and if we only consider the
> >>  growth rate in the past 15 years of misrule in Bihar, the targets would
> >>  never ever be achieved since the growth has been negative. One can only
> >>  extrapolate as to when the irrigation department of the state would
> >>  cease to function.
> >>
> >>  According to the water resources department (Minor
> >>  Irrigation), irrigation potential of 222,000 hectares had been created
> >>  by 2000 of which 84,800 hectares is through surface irrigation schemes
> >>  and 132,200 hectares is by lift irrigation and energized rural pump
> >>  sets. However, reports indicate that the surface irrigation schemes have
> >>  not operated at more than 60 per cent efficiency while the lift
> >>  irrigation schemes operate at a maximum efficiency of 10 per cent.
> >>  Ageing machines, erratic electricity supply, incompetent management and
> >>  indifference of users are stated to be the causes of underutilization of
> >>  these facilities.
> >>
> >>  There were a total of 2,316 Lift Irrigation
> >>  Schemes in the state of which 679 are defunct because of electrical
> >>  problems, 104 do not function because of mechanical problems, and 826
> >>  schemes suffer from a combination of both these defects. Another 221
> >>  schemes have fallen into disuse because of the shifting of the river
> >>  course away from the sump well or due to sand-casting (intake covered by
> >>  sand). Thus, only 482 schemes, or less that 21 per cent are
> >>  operational.
> >>
> >>  There are 5,558 State Tube Wells (STW) in the state with
> >>  a command area of 307,000 hectares. Of these, only 5,122 have received
> >>  electrical power. In the case of STWs, too, the operation record is poor
> >>  - 2,886 sets are inoperative because of electrical faults, 85 because of
> >>  mechanical trouble, and 302 because of defects in the power supply
> >>  transformers. As a result, according to the annual report of the Minor
> >>  Irrigation Dept, against a potential of 112,000 hectares, State Tube
> >>  Wells irrigated only 19,468 hectares of land in 1999-2000.
> >>
> >>  Bihar (now
> >>  Jharkhand) Hill Area Lift Irrigation Corporation (JHALCO) established in
> >>  1975 under Tribal Sub-Plan commissioned 394 Lift Irrigation Schemes in
> >>  the tribal areas of Jharkhand. According to reports, 284 of these
> >>  schemes are no longer functioning. Not surprisingly, if the rains are
> >>  delayed by only a week the state faces drought.
> >>
> >>  Actually, both the
> >>  data, whether it is given by Delhi or by Patna are fake if the farmers
> >>  are to be believed. They do not trust the irrigation establishment and
> >>  most of agriculture is based on their own enerprize. The Irrigation
> >>  Department claims all the development to its credit.
> >>
> >>  I am sure, the
> >>  situation in other states too, may not be as rosy as presented to be.
> >>  There is a need to strengthen the counter-research to blast the bogus
> >>  claims made by the irrigation bureucracy.
> >>
> >>  Dinesh Mishra
> >>
> >>
> >>  ________________________________
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  Assam mailing list
> >>  [email protected]
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>
> >>  Mailing list FAQ:
> >  > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>  ________________________________
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >  > Assam mailing list
> >>  [email protected]
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>
> >>  Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>
> >>  ________________________________
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  Assam mailing list
> >>  [email protected]
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>
> >>  Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>
> >>
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  Assam mailing list
> >>  [email protected]
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
> >>
> >>  Mailing list FAQ:
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
> >>  To unsubscribe or change options:
> >>  http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
>
_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam

Mailing list FAQ:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam

Reply via email to