No, there's nothing wrong with the other XML solutions, except the fact that we needed our solution in 2001, already, and that it runs on all the other platforms, too.
It turned out to be 3 times faster than XerCes, BTW, when there were some efforts at our site to get rid of it, in favor of XerCes, so this was not done (and XerCes is in C++, and we didn't want C++ at out site - or more precisely: we are a "C, PL/1 and ASSEMBLER only" shop). Kind regards Bernd Am 25.07.2013 11:51, schrieb Martin Packer:
Anything wrong with System XML? Perfectly feasible to use from HLASM. Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
