On 6/8/2014 3:15 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I suspect that the advent of PDSE partly impelled conversion to more
conventional access methods rather than duplicating in IEBCOPY
facilities available in PDSE and Binder.

Not only that, but the channel programs it used - which were once
considered "blazingly" fast - became inefficient on modern DASD. The
developers were able to speed up IEBCOPY processing and remove the
onerous APF requirement with one SMOP.

--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

Reply via email to