ISPF edit's compare command has existed for many years and uses SUPERC under 
the covers. Forget taking source off platform and give it a try. One of the 
options is number of lines for syncing. If there is a problem with syncing 
after changed lines, then look at the options. It worked great for code 
reviews. 
Regards, Jon. 

    On Monday, December 11, 2017 8:11 AM, Dave Wade <dave.g4...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
 

 If you have "old source" and find "new updates" and have removed the sequence 
numbers, then you probably can't easily work out how they applied...

Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-
> l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of John McKown
> Sent: 11 December 2017 14:21
> To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Any real need for sequence numbers in 73-80 any more?
> 
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > This has been discussed and cussed many many times before.  What's
> new?
> >
> 
> ​Sorry, I don't remember that. I didn't think to search the archives. I will 
> do
> that now and ask everyone's pardon.​
> 
> 
> 
> --
> I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it.
> 
> Maranatha! <><
> John McKown

   

Reply via email to