ISPF edit's compare command has existed for many years and uses SUPERC under the covers. Forget taking source off platform and give it a try. One of the options is number of lines for syncing. If there is a problem with syncing after changed lines, then look at the options. It worked great for code reviews. Regards, Jon.
On Monday, December 11, 2017 8:11 AM, Dave Wade <dave.g4...@gmail.com> wrote: If you have "old source" and find "new updates" and have removed the sequence numbers, then you probably can't easily work out how they applied... Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of John McKown > Sent: 11 December 2017 14:21 > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Any real need for sequence numbers in 73-80 any more? > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This has been discussed and cussed many many times before. What's > new? > > > > Sorry, I don't remember that. I didn't think to search the archives. I will > do > that now and ask everyone's pardon. > > > > -- > I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it. > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown