Was the 2321 the noodle reader? Ours never worked - I think we traded it in for several extra 2301s. The only problem w/2301 was it was twice as fast as LCS and it therefore could not perform i/o w/LCS.
SQA on 2301 was almost as good as LSQA. When the 360/91 arrived, that package that later became the cause for Rannie's boat paddle had a form of LSQA in it to realize the speed of the 91. And I know how old I am and how much I have forgotten that I can't remember Rannie's first name. Was the software package LSPS - large scale programming system? -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 12:33 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Poll Shirley you mean the 2321, a machine that only a mother could love. Or the early iterations of CROS. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mason.gmu.edu_-7Esmetz3&d=DwIFAw&c=Z4P52L0foFKAY1wcP-GmiQ&r=gPyXKYfguTF6KSwWL0MXilwlmRSg_lRVheZFw_2X3Uw&m=rVKTFHqhguoI60YAs1FNBFJ7Bukaml-lT-ITq8LLdnU&s=2f076YSeLoIPgkU11RrJFw6HS-rM7zlDnjhrNa3bHU4&e= ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> on behalf of Richard Kuebbing <rkueb...@tsys.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 12:31 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Poll As a short-timer ( I will retire soon w/58 yrs in IT and 53 yrs on 360) I have been quiet on the lists. But as a certified curmudgeon ... Poo or poop, because both sound like doing #2 Over the yrs I have seen/heard/... so much #2 passed off as work product ... (e.g. the original design of floating point processing on the 360/75 - it should be embarrassing having to do a re-pop) Peace be with y'all richard -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> On Behalf Of M. Ray Mullins Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 12:20 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Poll psIII missed a chance when setting the options for this poll. On 2019-09-16 15:45, Tony Thigpen wrote: > Pop, never Poo or poop, as both sound like doing #2. > > Tony Thigpen > > Phil Smith III wrote on 9/16/19 3:50 PM: >> Principles of Operation-how do you refer to it? (NOT including >> case-let's not make this any more complicated than it is already!) >> >> 1) PofOp >> >> 2) POP >> >> 3) POO >> >> 4) Pops >> >> 5) other? >> >> >> Just curious-there are no wrong answers, of course! (Well, I suppose >> "IntelR 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer Manuals" is >> wrong.) >> >> >> .phsiii >> >> >> -- M. Ray Mullins Roseville, CA, USA NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Unless you are the intended addressee, any review, reliance, dissemination, distribution, copying or use whatsoever of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please reply immediately and delete the material from all computers. Email sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not use email to send us confidential information such as credit card numbers, PIN numbers, passwords, Social Security Numbers, Account numbers, or other important and confidential information.
