Intresting, I’ve learned it’s called POP. I teach assembler programming and now I have to think about telling the students that there are several different thoughts about which abbreviation is the right one.
Olle Westergård, Core Systems SEB > 17 sep. 2019 kl. 05:02 skrev Mike Hochee <mike.hoc...@aspg.com>: > > POP, for many years, and I don't know why. I may lose sleep over this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Mike Shaw > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 8:25 PM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: Re: Poll > > POPs > > Mike Shaw > MVS/QuickRef Support Group > Chicago-Soft, Ltd. > > > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:50 PM Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com> wrote: >> >> Principles of Operation-how do you refer to it? (NOT including >> case-let's not make this any more complicated than it is already!) >> >> 1) PofOp >> >> 2) POP >> >> 3) POO >> >> 4) Pops >> >> 5) other? >> >> >> >> Just curious-there are no wrong answers, of course! (Well, I suppose >> "IntelR 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer Manuals" is >> wrong.) >> >> >> >> .phsiii >> >> >>
