Works better than it used to! It's good to ~2 billion now, right? Was only good to ~16 million when they coded it.
I'm not confused on how LA works in AMODE 31, am I? I never use it for integer arithmetic anymore so I could be off base here. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Rob van der Heij Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2019 11:01 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Questionable Instructions in Obtaining EAX documentation On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 20:51, Kerry Liles <kerry.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Old habits die hard... I still just use LA 1,256 although now I > might just code it as LA 1,256(,0) > I'm more worried about old code and old programmers doing LA 1,1(,1) doing arithmetic. Rob
