"I use instructions for what they do, not for their motivation or
nomenclature."

+1

OR   LA 1,1(,1) if you like.

On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 11:23, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:

> I have certainly been accused of being a pedant, and I freely use LA as an
> add immediate instruction for constants less than 4096. I use instructions
> for what they do, not for their motivation or nomenclature. Do you find it
> improper to use UNPK for purposes other than decimal arithmetic, e.g.,
> converting binary to hexadecimal for display? BCTR to decrement a register
> without testing it?
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] on
> behalf of Paul Gilmartin [00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:44 AM
> To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Making Encoded Bits Human Readable
>
> On Feb 7, 2022, at 23:10:49, Bob Raicer wrote:
> >
> > Just for fun, here is yet one more variation on Peter's scheme, using
> > only S/360 instructions.  In the comments, YY and ZZ represent the two
> > bit pairs of interest, lower case x represents bits or bytes of unknown
> > value.  Bit strings are enclosed in square brackets.  Bytes are separated
> > by underscore characters.
> >
> >          XR    R14,R14                  R14 = 00_00_00_00.
> >
> Is that the fastest way to clear R14 on S/360?
>
> >     ...
> >          LA    R14,X'F1'(,R14)          * Scale x'00' through x'03'
> >          LA    R15,X'F1'(,R15)          * to x'F1' through x'F4'
> >
> Is that more transparent than:
>          LA    R14,C'1'(,R14)
>          LA    R15,C'1'(,R15)
> ???  When I'm wearing my Pascal hat I loathe arithmetic operations
> on character operands.  When I wear my C hat they come naturally.
>
> A pedant insisted (here? lately?) that LA should be used only with
> operands referring to storage addresses.  I believe the rationale
> is that reckless use of LA in lieu of Immediate instructions, which
> have existed only recently, risks unexpected truncation to 24 bits
> or 31 bits.
>
> --
> gil
>

Reply via email to