Oh, I don't know that special commentary is necessary. Any such
effort to "fix it" would immediate be met with a wrist slap.
At 9/2/2025 12:08 PM, Tony Harminc wrote:
I probably knew of it from other contexts if I thought about it, but it
wouldn't have been top of mind.
On that note, I imagine few people looking at that explicit 0 index
register would know why it's there (and might be tempted to "fix" it as
part of a code review/cleanup), so I'd suggest a concise comment on each
usage. Something like "Explicit 0 index to avoid alignment msg".
Tony H.
