I use ASSP v2 with ClamAV and the additional virus/phish/spam databases on the SaneSecurity web site.
Some of these third party databases have higher risk of False Positives than others. It would be good it ASSP's behaviour on detecting such a 'virus' was able to be based on the database's risk factor. This risk factor is listed on: Sanesecurity's ClamAV - Phishing and Scam/Spam Signatures For example, I would like to be able to block any message that matches a pattern from a database with Low FP risk, and give different Penalty Box scores if it matches any of the Med or High risk databases. These third party databases greatly reduce the amount of spam that has to be processed, but the fear of FPs makes me nervous about using them in a blocking mode. Thanks, James. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
