On 29 May 2009 at 9:23, James Brown wrote: > I use ASSP v2 with ClamAV and the additional virus/phish/spam > databases on the SaneSecurity web site. > > Some of these third party databases have higher risk of False > Positives than others. > > It would be good it ASSP's behaviour on detecting such a 'virus' was > able to be based on the database's risk factor. This risk factor is > listed on: > > Sanesecurity's ClamAV - Phishing and Scam/Spam Signatures > > For example, I would like to be able to block any message that matches > a pattern from a database with Low FP risk, and give different Penalty > Box scores if it matches any of the Med or High risk databases. > > These third party databases greatly reduce the amount of spam that has > to be processed, but the fear of FPs makes me nervous about using them > in a blocking mode.
Cue grayhat :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
