2016-02-25 7:58 GMT+01:00 Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>: >>DoNoSpoofingMXIP - option to do DoNoSpoofing test only if A record of >>any MX record of recipient domain is in the list of LocalMXips > > So you would have to maintain 'LocalMXips' and 'localDomains' instead only > 'localDomains' ???? > > I can't see any advatage. > > Thomas
Like I said >On larger system its quite impossible to know when domain that you put in >localDomains has been since changed and its no longer >handled by your server >at all it email you recieve is in localDomains there is no doubt that is local (since you recieved it) but for tests like DoNoSpoofing , localDomains is a stale source of information that could have changed at any time (by change of MX records) there is a need for adresing this - maybe check MX record every time to determine is domain is local instead of localDomains or maybe check MX every 30 minutes and make temp list of local domains. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
