Yes, exactly my point. A delay is very effective, but not very user-friendly. AFAIK, SMTP was never intended for direct delivery but people nowadays don't expect anything else (well, i have more than once delay times of over 20 minuts or longer when sending to hotmail).
Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt: >> And yet, for me, the delay feature is currently one >> of the most effective - at least until the spammers >> figure it out. (Fingers crossed...) > > But you pay a heavy price by delaying a lot of completely legal > messages. My users are not happy with such a solution. > > So I try to > - reduce delaying by profiling the IP > - catch spam before delaying > - catch spam instead of delaying > > fritz > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
