Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
> The numbering on my development work is for only one purpose regarding
> the public: it shows there is a new version inside a version -
> therefore the(). From my viewpoint, date/time would be sufficient.
> People asked for some sort of versionnaming. I use the naming for
> checkpoints - to remind me where we are ( finalcandidate, publicbeta,
> whatever it is, we think , we are working on).

It would be great if someone could write up a chart listing the acronyms
and parenthesis use - so the testers that are not a part of the
development process understand what it is we are testing changes to and
may have a better feel for what to be wary or aware of.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to