On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 10:45 -0500, Hill, Brett wrote: > Ever consider renaming the sensitive info (ie: email addresses, IP info, > etc) in the header information? That's what I do when I post headers to > the forum.
Yeah, but I thought that might defeat some of the point behind it. Also not sure what difference it would make to show the headers here. When I get a 0.00 score in the analyzer. It's pretty clear something is going on internally, for the message to be rejected as spam. Not sure what seeing the headers could do, since one would assume. Whether analyzing an email, or it being processed as normal. It would hit all the same bayesian logic, and end up with the same score. Since the db hasn't been rebuilt. Anyway, despite my doubts, I might scrub an email later on and post to list. Although won't be expecting much from that. I know it's legit email. Only thing I could see that is causing their stuff to be rejected is more HTML than text. But that's not what analyzing reports. So no clue. Now when I analyze other spam email rejected. That does show a spam score that justifies it being rejected. It's quite odd, and very annoying. -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
