Hello all,
I'm currently running in test mode, and a user was concerned that an email from 
a regular correspondent was marked as spam. I looked further and found that the 
spam reason was URIBL failure. All the IP addresses in the headers resolve to 
credible email servers, and even SPF passed. Does anyone know why W3.org is 
shown as a reason for the email being spam?
I've included the less private parts of the headers.
Thank very much,
Miles


X-Original-Authentication-Results: ASSP.nospam; spf=pass
X-Assp-Message-Score: -10 (SPF pass)
X-Assp-IP-Score: -10 (SPF pass)
X-Assp-Message-Score: 50 (URIBLcache: fail, w3.org listed in
        black.uribl.com)
X-Assp-IP-Score: 50 (URIBLcache: fail, w3.org listed in black.uribl.com)
X-Assp-URIBLcache: fail, w3.org listed in black.uribl.com
X-Assp-Redlisted: Yes (bounces are not collected)
X-Assp-Spam: YES
X-Assp-Block: NO (all in testmode)
X-Spam-Status: yes
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: URIBLcache: fail, w3.org listed in black.uribl.com
X-Assp-Tag: MessageLimit
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore passed low limit
X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 40
X-Assp-Spam-Level: *********
Return-Path: <>



  ________________________________
Castle Howard Estate is a limited company registered in England and Wales. 
Registered Number: 480214. Registered Office: Estate Office, Castle Howard, 
York, YO60 7DA. This message is private and confidential. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to