On 10/08/2013 10:59 PM, David Korn wrote:
Actually the fix was in ksh93u which is an official release in
www.research.att.com/sw/download.
There must be a flow then in debian and ubuntu, and may be that explain
why suse look imune, they all use various ksh93u+
May be there where a window for ksh93u that distro grabbed the source
from who got the bug, or they call ksh_93u+ something that is not 'u'.
Whatever it is 'modern' debian and ubuntu (3.x kernel) deserve a working
ksh out of the box, and this is not the case at time of writing.
I will get back to debian list and ask for a later source push.
My fear is that nobody care about packaging (.deb) the ksh, I got no
idea about how they do that.
Cheers,
Phi
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
