On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Phi <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/08/2013 10:59 PM, David Korn wrote: >> >> Actually the fix was in ksh93u which is an official release in >> www.research.att.com/sw/download. > > > There must be a flow then in debian and ubuntu, and may be that explain why > suse look imune, they all use various ksh93u+ > > May be there where a window for ksh93u that distro grabbed the source from > who got the bug, or they call ksh_93u+ something that is not 'u'. > > Whatever it is 'modern' debian and ubuntu (3.x kernel) deserve a working ksh > out of the box, and this is not the case at time of writing. > > I will get back to debian list and ask for a later source push. > > My fear is that nobody care about packaging (.deb) the ksh, I got no idea > about how they do that.
Didn't Olga say she'll take over the Debian ksh package? AFAIK she's the candidate with the best qualifications Irek _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
