On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Roland Mainz <roland.ma...@nrubsig.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Irek Szczesniak <iszczesn...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Our build of ast-ksh.20120911 fails with src/cmd/ksh93/sh/io.c", line >> 1008: undefined symbol: SOCK_CLOEXEC >> >> I used the patch below to fix the problem, but then ran into the old >> bug with shtests: line 307: write to 1 failed [Bad file number]. >> >> Now the question is: Is Solaris still going to be supported? Or is >> support fading away? I've seen many other opensource projects >> abandoning Solaris after Oracle killed Opensolaris... > > As Glenn said Solaris will be supported. The problem is partially my > fault... we run a lot of experiments right now and not all platforms > are tested properly (it's called "alpha" for a reason... :-) ) ... > > Attached (as "astksh20120911_solaris_fix001.diff.txt") is a patch > which fixes the build and runtime problems... > > Long-term solution may be to add a |_ast_accept4()| in libast as > portability layer for OSes which do not have |accept4()| (I'm not fond > of that name... ;-( ).
Thank you for the patch. Irek _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@research.att.com https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
