On Sunday 09 October 2005 00:56, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Dinesh Nair wrote: > > in this instance, it definitely would be safer for the freebsd folk to > > use chan_woomera to provide h.323 functionality on asterisk as this is a > > legal quagmire an open source project (freebsd in this case) cant get > > mired in. > > I have already responded to most of this in my last post, but I will add > one more point: we could certainly add a clause to the LICENSE file that > gave distributions the right to make non-substantial modifications to > the source code for compatibility/etc. without losing the ability to use > the trademark. This would not allow (for example) bundling in major > changes such as 'bristuff', but would allow for file locations to be > changed, permissions modification, that sort of thing, designed for > compatibility with the platform it's being built for.
Is this your personal position on the matter or are you posting in an official capacity as a Digium employee? -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Biz mailing list Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz