On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 21:58 -0400, Peter Beckman wrote: > Using SeLinux still relies on one knowing which boxes to check and > uncheck, what happens when you check or uncheck a box, and how to > configure it to be secure. Besides, it's overkill if you are running an > Asterisk box. >
it also relies upon linux, and not everyone using asterisk is using linux. Anything that further ties asterisk to a particular operating system seems counterproductive. systrace would likely be a better unix alternative than selinux given what selinux does (generally speaking it adds a 3rd id to the uid/gid pair). This still makes it somewhat harder for the windows port of asterisk, which I dont know how much of that still works, I know that some of it got broken by other patches after it was working, I do not know if it has been updated to allow for asterisk to run in windows. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel pgp key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8AE5C721
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
