23 maj 2012 kl. 14:21 skrev Kevin P. Fleming:

> While this behavior is technically not RFC3261 compliant (and I've had 
> discussions about it with at least one of the RFC's authors), it's quite 
> useful in making decisions about whether a peer has become unavailable more 
> quickly than would normally be possible. For a local peer that responds to 
> OPTIONS requests in 100ms or less, if that peer stops responding, Asterisk 
> will be able to make that determination in approximately 6 seconds, instead 
> of the 32 seconds that would normally be required.

Form the RFC:

"T1 is an estimate of the round-trip time (RTT), and it defaults to 500 ms."

"The default value for T1 is 500 ms. T1 is an estimate of the RTT between the 
client and server transactions.
Elements MAY (though it is NOT RECOMMENDED ) use smaller values of T1 within 
closed, private networks
that do not permit general Internet connection. T1 MAY be chosen larger, and 
this is RECOMMENDED if it
is known in advance (such as on high latency access links) that the RTT is 
larger. Whatever the value of T1,
the exponential backoffs on retransmissions described in this section MUST be 
used."

I can't see how this is not RFC 3261 compliant. We have a good estimate of the 
RTT and use it.

/O
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz

Reply via email to