I'm not thinking less of Asterisk because of the this list. I'm merely suggesting that we would be no worse, and in my opinion we would be much better, if we could just check the attitudes at the door. For the project to grow, people need to feel welcome to contribute. I shouldn't be nervous to ask questions to the -dev list. That seems counter intuitive.
I think that the "code of conduct" would be a great thing for the list. Part of the code should describe policy regarding treatment of other developers and would-be developers. Nick On 4/9/07, Steve Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Michael Grigoni wrote: > Steve Edwards wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Nicholas Campion wrote: >> >>> This is one of the more hostile lists I've seen, >> >> Back in the day, the VMS mailing list made this list look like a tea party. >> Carl Lydic would slice and dice noobs with profanity and vulgarity. > > Indeed, and caused many a flame war and impacted on VMS and DEC > in ways yet to be fully assessed. I don't think anybody thought worse of VMS or DEC because of Carl's lack of manners. I didn't. > Do you want that here? No. And I think this "mis-subjected" thread should die now. Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
