Matthew Jordan wrote:
<snip>
My problem is when I get arguments like "it's there in PJIP so we
have to use it" or "we can't do anything because of PJSIP".
That's not my argument at all.
My argument is thus:
* PJSIP provides DNS resolution that far exceeds what is capable in
Asterisk today and does so in an obtrusive fashion. It has no
negative side effects to the rest of Asterisk. It's three lines of
code to enable it. I want to turn it on. * If Asterisk's core DNS
catches up - and hopefully surpasses PJSIP - then by all means, let
us as a project submit a patch to PJSIP that makes their DNS
resolution pluggable. That would allow us to modify the res_pjsip
stack to use Asterisk's DNS support.
Inobtrusive, not obtrusive. Two different words.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
