> On March 14, 2014, 6:18 p.m., rmudgett wrote: > > /branches/1.8/main/callerid.c, line 624 > > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3356/diff/1/?file=56016#file56016line624> > > > > I would be surprised if this worked for calls that the checksum was not > > zero. > > > > I think the expression should be: > > > > if ((b + cid->cksum) & 0xff) > > > > Otherwise you have a more likely overflow when the message bytes sum to > > larger than 8 bits.
The "b" variable already has prior logic that decides to mask its lower 8 bits or not. I did it this way to maintain CID failure in the case of bit 8 or bit 9 being set by fsk_modem. Your line would ignore both those errors. Granted, I could see the argument that we should probably try to pass CID even in the case that we get checksum errors, but I was just trying to follow the code convention. - rmeyerriecks ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3356/#review11208 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 14, 2014, 5:10 p.m., rmeyerriecks wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3356/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 14, 2014, 5:10 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Bugs: asterisk-23488 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/asterisk-23488 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > Callerid checksum-ing is being handled incorrectly here. When the checksum is > calculated to be 0x00, it will perform 0x100-0x00 which results in 0x100. > This value will then fail the otherwise correct callerid message. It was > intended for devices on the rx side to simply add the calculated checksum to > the transmitted 2's compliment checksum. A much simpler operation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > /branches/1.8/main/callerid.c 410575 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3356/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > rmeyerriecks > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev