----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3454/#review12352 -----------------------------------------------------------
I'm going to close out this review to https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3679/, as it includes both the fix for FireFox along with the SHA-256 issue. This patch, while it fixed it locally, did not address the situation when Asterisk is the controller of the ICE negotiation. The patch on r3679 does. - Matt Jordan On April 16, 2014, 3:43 a.m., Marko Seidenglanz wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3454/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 16, 2014, 3:43 a.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Bugs: ASTERISK-23026 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-23026 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > The following patch must be applied to res_rtp_asterisk to make outgoing > calls to WebRTC capable browsers working. This is necessary due to the > following issue in role negotiation: > https://code.google.com/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=2717&can=4&colspec=ID%20Pri%20Mstone%20ReleaseBlock%20Area%20Status%20Owner%20Summary > > > Diffs > ----- > > http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/trunk/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c 412438 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3454/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Marko Seidenglanz > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
