George Joseph wrote: <snip>
5. The idea of higher level concept configuration has been thrown around as something to make this easier. I personally think this sort of thing belongs there. A type=trunk, itsp, phone, etc. Lower level blocks remain the same and additional logic on top can be added to handle this sort of thing. Are you thinking like users.conf? I thought you guys wanted that to die a horrible death. :) Seriously though, are you thinking along the lines of a new composite pjsip configuration object that creates the base objects behind the scenes? If so, that'd solve a lot and I could start working on it right now. I just thought you guys were shying away from these types of things.
As base objects it's a bad idea. As a single object to rule them all (a user) it's also a complicated/bad idea. As higher level concepts which represent things that people are familiar with they're fine.
-- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev