George Joseph wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Joshua Colp <jc...@digium.com <mailto:jc...@digium.com>> wrote:George Joseph wrote: <snip> Or separate objects from a config file perspective but implemented in pjsip_configuration with endpoint. Completely separate. Mixing the two defeats the purpose of having a clear boundary. Ok, how about this... 2 new object types called "composite" and "pattern" (or whatever) implemented in a separate res_pjsip_* module [mytrunk] type = composite pattern = trunk etc... [trunk] type = pattern register = yes contacts = static outbound_auth = yes inbound_auth = no identify = yes
I don't understand the naming or what they mean at first glance ^_^ -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
