----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4412/#review14437 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! branches/13/res/ari/ari_websockets.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4412/#comment24957> Nitpick: this should be < 0 instead of <= 0. 0 is a valid fd, even though it's usually reserved for STDIN_FILENO. - Mark Michelson On Feb. 10, 2015, 6:06 p.m., Kevin Harwell wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4412/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 10, 2015, 6:06 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Bugs: ASTERISK-24701 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24701 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > When writing to a websocket if a timeout occurred the underlying socket did > not get closed/disconnected. This patch makes sure the websocket gets > disconnected on a write timeout. Also a notice is logged stating that the > websocket was disconnected. > > > Diffs > ----- > > branches/13/res/res_http_websocket.c 431641 > branches/13/res/ari/ari_websockets.c 431641 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4412/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > I had trouble getting an actual write timeout to occur, so I just forced an > error on write to make sure the underlying socket would get closed and the > notice was logged. Also ran relevant testsuite and unit tests. > > > Thanks, > > Kevin Harwell > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev