On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:04 AM Joshua C. Colp <jc...@sangoma.com> wrote:

> Not really, and I think part of the problem is that this entire thing
> hasn't really been documented, communicated, or been a strict part of the
> release or development process. It's been more organic. Going forward it
> would be explicitly part of the steps when cutting the new branch, for
> example, and part of the announcement.
>

OK, thanks for the clarification.  Consider me in favor of the process as
you outlined it, and also in favor of a more aggressive stance on
deprecation of modules that obviously aren't being heavily used/maintained.

-Jared
-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to