On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:18 PM Corey Farrell <g...@cfware.com> wrote:
> Yes I'm suggesting documenting that it is deprecated in minor releases. > Ending support in a minor seems bad unless support already doesn't exist. > Could we add AST_MODULE_SUPPORT_CORE_DEPRECATED and > AST_MODULE_SUPPORT_EXTENDED_DEPRECATED to `enum ast_module_support_level`? > Then a module would get one of those support levels in a minor, > AST_MODULE_SUPPORT_DEPRECATED in master. > We could, but just so I'm clear - it would be stated as "to be deprecated in future" essentially in minor releases and then marked as deprecated in master? -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Technical Lead Sangoma Technologies Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
