Speaking of faxes. We have a fax server. Will Asterisk recognize an incoming fax and route it there or is this what you guys have been talking about?
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 08:06 -0500, Ryan Brindley wrote: > Rajesh, > Unfortunately, its still in the discussion stage. I'll give an update > when I hear anything. > > Following Neil Stone's comment, if you are interested in hearing about > a fax update, please start a new thread and don't reply to an > unrelated thread. Its quite annoying to readers when that happens, and > eventually many loose their willingness to help. So, if you were > unaware, consider this a quick 101 of mailing lists. If you were > aware, consider this a warning that if you want to be taken seriously, > you'll have to be respectful. > > -- > Ryan Brindley > Digium, Inc. | Software Developer > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > main: +1 256-428-6000 fax: +1 256-864-0464 > Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rajesh Kumar ( Alshaya Group International )" > <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 5:14:38 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] Queue Agent Support Needs Major Rewrite > > Hey any update on fax as Digium as released fax application hope to > see it soon on gui > > > > > Regards, > > Rajesh Kumar > Alshaya Group International > [email protected] > Tel (+965 2298-0555 Ext 307) > Mobile (+965 9722-4083) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > <[email protected]> > To: Asterisk GUI project discussion <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon Apr 13 22:32:59 2009 > Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] Queue Agent Support Needs Major Rewrite > > George, > You are definitely right, and both are known issues. > > When I first got onto the GUI dev team and looked at the queues stuff, > the 'secret' sharing was one of the first red flags I saw. Its since > been proposed that an 'agentsecret' variable be in users.conf for the > very reason. And while I can't update on the status of that feature, I > can at least report that its acknowledged. > > As for the 'an indication that the left hand doesn't know about the > right...', besides that that comment is a bit unnecessary; its also > just not true. If you look at > http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14459, you'll see that we were > aware of this at least in Feb (although I'd claim more like Nov of > 08), and that its a blocker for the next release of the open source > GUI. The reasoning for the delay in development can simply be > explained by listing my schedule. Good news is that its next on the > list. :-) > > When I begin development on AddQueueMember (replacing > AgentCallBackLogin), I'll report back to this thread on the svn branch > if you're interested in helping test. > > -- > Ryan Brindley > Digium, Inc. | Software Developer > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > main: +1 256-428-6000 fax: +1 256-864-0464 > Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "George Pajari" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 2:04:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: [asterisk-gui] Queue Agent Support Needs Major Rewrite > > Just started to try to use the queue agent and the current > implementation of the Asterisk GUI essentially renders these features > unusable for us. > > The major problem is that the agent login password, incredibly, is the > same as the SIP secret. Obviously this needs to be changed so that the > agent passwords are > separate and independent of any other authentication information (for > SIP or whatever). (I won't comment on the fact that this little gem > appears not to be documented anywhere.) > > A less important issue but an indication that the left hand doesn't > know > about the right is the fact that AgentCallbackLogin is deprecated in > 1.4 > (and is removed in 1.6) yet is still being used in AsteriskGUI 2. > > I'll hand code some stuff in the extensions.conf so we can use queues > but either the queue support in Asterisk GUI needs to be fixed or > removed. To have those tabs suggesting that queues can be used through > the GUI is just cruel temptation. > > -- > George Pajari (dCAP), netVOICE communications 604 484 VOIP(8647) x102 > www.netvoice.ca www.ip-centrex.ca www.ip-pbx.ca www.vpas.ca > www.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca www.sipura.ca www.snom.ca > Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists 1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102) > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-gui mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-gui mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-gui mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-gui mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
