Thank you and sorry for wondering down a rabbit trail.
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:47 -0500, Ryan Brindley wrote: > I'm not a fax expert, but I imagine if you have certain DIDs for > faxing that Asterisk can route those to the fax server. I think I've > heard of that before...again...I've never personally done an > installation requiring this, only heard of it. You can ask in > [email protected], or IRC, or anything for a better > answer, if no one else chimes in. :-) > > -- > Ryan Brindley > Digium, Inc. | Software Developer > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > main: +1 256-428-6000 fax: +1 256-864-0464 > Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Crandell" <[email protected]> > To: "Ryan Brindley" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Asterisk GUI project discussion" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 10:40:01 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] Fax on Asterisk GUI > > Ryan, > > I'm not interested in Asterisk handling the faxes just having it route > an incoming fax to our fax server. Will it do that without FFA? > > Sounds like FFA is going to turn Asterisk into a pretty sweet product > and with your GUI on top of it ... wow. > > Thanks > Bob > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 09:06 -0500, Ryan Brindley wrote: > > Bob, > Digium just released Fax For Asterisk (FFA, > http://www.digium.com/en/products/software/faxforasterisk.php). > Rajesh was wondering when a GUI page would be committed, so that users could > use the new FFA on the GUI. > > -- > Ryan Brindley > Digium, Inc. | Software Developer > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > > main: +1 256-428-6000 fax: +1 256-864-0464 > Check us out at: http://digium.com & http://asterisk.org > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Crandell" <[email protected]> > To: "Asterisk GUI project discussion" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 8:37:59 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada > Central > Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] Fax on Asterisk GUI > > Speaking of faxes. We have a fax server. Will Asterisk > recognize an incoming fax and route it there or is this what > you guys have been talking about? > > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 08:06 -0500, Ryan Brindley wrote: > > Rajesh, > Unfortunately, its still in the discussion stage. I'll > give an update when I hear anything. > > Following Neil Stone's comment, if you are interested > in hearing about a fax update, please start a new > thread and don't reply to an unrelated thread. Its > quite annoying to readers when that happens, and > eventually many loose their willingness to help. So, > if you were unaware, consider this a quick 101 of > mailing lists. If you were aware, consider this a > warning that if you want to be taken seriously, you'll > have to be respectful. > > -- > Ryan Brindley > Digium, Inc. | Software Developer > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > > main: +1 256-428-6000 fax: +1 256-864-0464 > > Check us out at: http://digium.com & > http://asterisk.org > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rajesh Kumar ( Alshaya Group International )" > <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 5:14:38 PM GMT -06:00 > US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] Queue Agent Support Needs > Major Rewrite > > Hey any update on fax as Digium as released fax > application hope to see it soon on gui > > > > > Regards, > > Rajesh Kumar > Alshaya Group International > [email protected] > Tel (+965 2298-0555 Ext 307) > Mobile (+965 9722-4083) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > <[email protected]> > To: Asterisk GUI project discussion > <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon Apr 13 22:32:59 2009 > Subject: Re: [asterisk-gui] Queue Agent Support Needs > Major Rewrite > > George, > You are definitely right, and both are known issues. > > When I first got onto the GUI dev team and looked at > the queues stuff, the 'secret' sharing was one of the > first red flags I saw. Its since been proposed that an > 'agentsecret' variable be in users.conf for the very > reason. And while I can't update on the status of that > feature, I can at least report that its acknowledged. > > As for the 'an indication that the left hand doesn't > know about the right...', besides that that comment is > a bit unnecessary; its also just not true. If you look > at http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14459, you'll > see that we were aware of this at least in Feb > (although I'd claim more like Nov of 08), and that its > a blocker for the next release of the open source GUI. > The reasoning for the delay in development can simply > be explained by listing my schedule. Good news is that > its next on the list. :-) > > When I begin development on AddQueueMember (replacing > AgentCallBackLogin), I'll report back to this thread > on the svn branch if you're interested in helping > test. > > -- > Ryan Brindley > Digium, Inc. | Software Developer > 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA > main: +1 256-428-6000 fax: +1 256-864-0464 > Check us out at: http://digium.com & > http://asterisk.org > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "George Pajari" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 2:04:56 PM GMT -06:00 > US/Canada Central > Subject: [asterisk-gui] Queue Agent Support Needs > Major Rewrite > > Just started to try to use the queue agent and the > current > implementation of the Asterisk GUI essentially renders > these features > unusable for us. > > The major problem is that the agent login password, > incredibly, is the > same as the SIP secret. Obviously this needs to be > changed so that the > agent passwords are > separate and independent of any other authentication > information (for > SIP or whatever). (I won't comment on the fact that > this little gem > appears not to be documented anywhere.) > > A less important issue but an indication that the left > hand doesn't know > about the right is the fact that AgentCallbackLogin is > deprecated in 1.4 > (and is removed in 1.6) yet is still being used in > AsteriskGUI 2. > > I'll hand code some stuff in the extensions.conf so we > can use queues > but either the queue support in Asterisk GUI needs to > be fixed or > removed. To have those tabs suggesting that queues can > be used through > the GUI is just cruel temptation. > > -- > George Pajari (dCAP), netVOICE communications 604 484 > VOIP(8647) x102 > www.netvoice.ca www.ip-centrex.ca www.ip-pbx.ca > www.vpas.ca > www.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca www.sipura.ca > www.snom.ca > Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists 1 877 NET VOIP > (638 8647 x102) > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by > http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-gui mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by > http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-gui mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by > http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-gui mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui > > > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth > and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > asterisk-gui mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options > visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-gui mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-gui
