Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
I beleive the username should be without the @xxx
anyway I just read a draft of Asterisk Handbook2 and here what it sais about the username option:
username: username Asterisk tries to connect when for some reason it differs from the one used when client registered.
What I would like to have is on my SIP phones( Snom 100 ) that when a call is recieved it look like that it is from [EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Without the need to add extra extensions that point to SIP channels in extensions.conf.
is there a way to do it?
nope,
I`m trying to have a setting like:
[1001] type=friend [EMAIL PROTECTED] secret=phila host=dynamic defaultip=172.20.0.199 canreinvite=yes ; Cisco poops on reinvite sometimes mailbox=1001
but changing to username=phila
doesnt help. On console I see things like:
NOTICE[122896]: File chan_sip.c, Line 3629 (handle_request): Registration from '"Anton Yurchenko" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' failed for '172.20.0.199'
only when its like
[phila] ... ..
it works. Username is not taken into account it seems.
thnks
roy
On Monday 24 March 2003 13:58, Anton Yurchenko wrote:
Hello,
what purpose does the username option for a peer serves in sip.conf? I saw a mention the you could for example define an extension like:
[999] host=dynamic secret=blah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but this doesnt work like this. Asterisk writes that registration failed
on the console, and ethereal shows 401 Unauthorized responce that * sends.
but it works like:
[blah] host=dynamic secret=blah
the park in [] is used as a username always. But that would need one more string in extensions.conf, to forward 999 to sip extension.
or am I doing something wrong. I use the latest CVS, this issue AFAIK has been the same since I`ve started using *.
Thnx,
--
Anton Yurchenko<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Digital Generation
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
