I think you have something backwards. PRI on E1 is great - 100% standard throughout the world, apart from some very old leftovers. Its the CAS stuff which needs endless new state machines. They really do need state machines. Write them in C, or do as we did (draw them graphically in Autocad, and compile them directly down to ROM tables). Either way you build a state machine.

Regards,
Steve


Martin Pycko wrote:


Maybe if they'd write the PRI stack in C instead of making a state machine
they woun'd need to make adjustments so often.

regards
Martin

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Steve Underwood wrote:



Do people actually do the *ANI*DNIS* thing on E1s? I've never seen that.
E1s are a real pain for anything but PRI or SS7. There is so little
standardisation. A place I used to work has a substantial team turning
out new signalling protocol state machines for each customer of its E1
muxes.

Regards,
Steve




_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to