> a.) In an effort to push Linux's poor job of handling interrupt > latancy, which makes it a not so good choice for real time systems > that the TE410 driver is simply pushing the limits a little. > Which is all right by me :)
Well, Zaptel needs to service interrupts once every 1000 microseconds. If not, it misses a sample (not the end of the world, mind you). No driver should leave interrupts disabled for anywhere *near* 1000 microseconds. If you need that long, put it in a bottom-half handler. > b.) The TE410 driver needs a little tweaking to play better > with others and handle it's interrupt requests better. > Which is all right by me too :) If interrupts are disabled there is nothing we can do, except not interrupt as frequently, but this leads to additional latency. Mark _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
