On 15/10/03 00:15, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:

Does anybody else have a strong opinion one way or the other? If it is left to John and myself we have a 1:1 vote.

See how much easier it is to follow the thread of conversation if you quote just enough of the e-mail you're responding to so people know what's going on without having to read through pages of text?


Please see RFC 1855:
 - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html

Decent mail clients that behave sensibly regarding quoting are easy to come by. You can even set up Outlook to behave vaguely properly and quote using >.

As a matter of fact, I am of the opinion that the response to E-mails
should go at the top to save time.

So, it's not worth *your* time organizing your e-mail sensibly, but it's worth everyone else's time having to dig through lines of text to work out what the context is? I find that selfish, at best.


Please see the following page (strong words warning). It pretty much sums it all up nicely:
- http://thegestalt.org/simon/quoterant.html


--
Al Maw

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to