On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:14:33AM +0100, Tim Panton wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2006, at 07:53, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > > >Tim Panton wrote: > >>Well, with 16 phones, it might be worth putting a > >>'satellite' asterisk in their office, have it handle local > >>transfers, and act as a protocol converter, talking sip to the > >>phones and (trunked) IAX2 to the outside world. > >>An embedded low power system would do fine. > >>You might even get away with an nslu2, but I'm not sure > >>it has the RAM for 16 calls. > >>A better alternative is to get them to upgrade the DSL to 512 uplink. > >>Tim. > > > > Neither the unslung nor the wrt support IAX trunking. Zaptel does > >not compile on either of these architectures. > > > > No zaptel = no timer = no trunking/meetme/etc. > > Just out of curiosity, is ztdummy on kernel 2.6.12.2 architecture > specific? i.e. > would it care if it were on an armv5teb not on x86 ?
ztdummy on kernel 2.6 has tw implementations: with USE_RTC defined (the default on x86, at least) it uses the rtc clock of the system. This is availble on x86 and amd64. I don't know if other architectures have anything equivalent. Without it, it relies on HZ=1000 . That was the only possible value up until 2.6.13 , so I guess that in the specific kernel you refer to it should hold. > > I understand that the _real_ zaptel modules will be much harder to port, > I just figured that ztdummy might be easier. Most other modules are PCI cards. Two others are USB. I don't know how much architecture-specific are PCI and USB. There are also ztdynamic and friends. In theory nothing prevents them from being portable. -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
