Anton Krall wrote:

after all, like you said, it is open
source..

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Moises Silva

|At the end, is open source/freesoftware, if you dont like it, nobody
|is stopping you from change it.


One of the beauties of the open-source development method is certainly the ability for the user to modify the source code independently.

Realize, however, that the essense of that independent code modification is also termed as a code fork - particularly if the modified code is maintained long-term and especially if it is redistributed.

While I do believe that a light amount of user-experimentation-forking is normally to be expected and is healthy (because it generally will help in getting increased exposure and, in turn, flushing out bugs and such), if you hear the "Don't like it? Fork." mantra too much or too frequently I believe that it is a sign of an unhealthy situation. I hear it all of the time around here - way, way too much, I would think.

I think that a healthier scenario would be where the developers (who should actually be listening and care about what users feel, think, and want) would work with the users to find possible avenues to solutions... and if, indeed, a fork is the best way forward - then to do it in a way that is as collaborative as possible.

Lee.

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to