> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SIP > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 8:56 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Teliax Quality of Service > > Steve Totaro wrote: > > Anthony Francis wrote: > > > >> Tim Panton wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On 5 Aug 2007, at 06:54, Douglas Garstang wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure > >>>> is unreasonable. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> It's impossible. I can't think of a single example where this > >>> actually exists. > >>> > >>> Getting even close is hideously expensive. > >>> > >>> Tim, speaking for himself :-) > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > >>> > >>> asterisk-users mailing list > >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> In fact, the only people who would say something like this are folks > who > >> have never PHYSICALLY implemented a network, they simply don't > >> understand the limitations involved. > >> > >> Anthony > >> > >> > >> > > > > What if a train derails and slices through the main fiber connections. > > OK, so you have XO, Global Crossing, Verizon, and UCN all for > > redundancy. Well guess what? They are all most likely running over > > those strands of fiber. You better have a VSAT connection too!
Good grief. No, you have two physical collocations. One in say in Nevada or Idaho (least likely states to suffer natural disasters) and one in New York. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
