This is esp true of any VoIP PBX system. In fact I think many of them run Windows.
I do have a related question about how * users are creating redundancy in thier setups? I am going live in a few days with a single office setup where I have patched the * PBX in front of our existing legacy phone system, giving us auto attendent and voice mail, plus the potential to do a large scale test of IP phones. If successful the next step is a 150-400 station multi-office setup. Most calls are inter-building such that we currently only need 6 outbound lines to the PSTN. -- Jonathan Moore Director of Technology Winfield Public Schools Office 620.221.5100 Fax 620.221.0508 Quoting Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 10:56, Jim Flagg wrote: > > Just curious if any of the Asterisk installers are doing anything special > > to protect themselves from a possible lawsuit caused by 911 failure > > during a Asterisk/computer crash? > > > > I realize that any traditional PBX or even a phone line can fail but, > > anything running on a computer is probably going to be less reliable > > than most PBXs. > > What do you think most PBXs are? Maybe not a x86, but it is a computer. > > > Anybody requiring customers to acknowledge and sign any kind of > > waiver? Just the legal fees of defending yourself in a lawsuit could > > sink most Asterisk installers. > > Good question otherwise. > -- > Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > Visit Winfield Public Schools at http://usd465.com ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users