While I can't be sure this is correct, I'd assume there are 2 pieces to executing a line of code, the first one does all the expansion and variable replacement, and the second one actually executes the line. From the behavior I'd have to guess that INC() is handled by first part and not the second.
Ira >I see your name enough to know this must be a true statement; Can you >elaborate a little on why? > >On Wednesday 22 July 2009 08:30:03 Danny Nicholas wrote: > > You should submit this as a bug. It may or may not get fixed, but it > > definitely won't until someone reports it or takes it upon themselves to > > fix it. > >Don't bother. It's not fixable. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
