On Wednesday 22 July 2009 13:56:39 Ira wrote: > Danny Nicholas wrote: > > Tilghman Lesher wrote: > > >On Wednesday 22 July 2009 08:30:03 Danny Nicholas wrote: > > > > You should submit this as a bug. It may or may not get fixed, but it > > > > definitely won't until someone reports it or takes it upon themselves > > > > to fix it. > > > > > >Don't bother. It's not fixable. > > > >I see your name enough to know this must be a true statement; Can you > >elaborate a little on why? > > While I can't be sure this is correct, I'd assume there are 2 pieces > to executing a line of code, the first one does all the expansion and > variable replacement, and the second one actually executes the line. > From the behavior I'd have to guess that INC() is handled by first > part and not the second.
That is precisely the reason. I could not have said it better myself. -- Tilghman & Teryl with Peter, Cottontail, Midnight, Thumper, & Johnny (bunnies) and Harry, BB, & George (dogs) _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users