On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:23 PM, C F <shma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Philipp von Klitzing > <klitz...@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: >> Hey hey! >> >>> Anyone got any subjective (!) views on the merits of these two ranges >>> , using asterisk 1.4 ? I need to supply approx 30 handsets to a new >>> client, with the senior managers (6) having some slightly more >>> "managerial" phones >> >> * Let the customer test and decide himself >> * Polycom: great speaker phone, but no built-in BLF > > Which planet do you live on? Yes there is built-in BLF. You can > program any available line button as a BLF. > >> * Snom: poor speaker phone, many BLF buttons & more > > But poor sound quality not to mention stability. > >> * Configuration and flexibility is great with the SNOMs, if you like you >> can even stream video to a snom 370 or 820 > > Configuration with the Polycoms is very flexible just not as easy as > peeling a banana. So if your skills spread beyond that of a chimpanzee > you should be able to manage.
I realized now (after receiving an email off list) that the above could be interpreted as being directed at a person. I am apologizing if thats how anyone understood it. My wording were meant to be directed at the skills required and not at anyone person. > >> * The snom 8xx firmware still has its quirks (not fully mature yet), so >> I'd say better stick with the 3xx series for the moment >> >> Yours, Philipp >> >> >> -- >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- >> >> asterisk-users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> > -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users