On 26 September 2010 18:48, bruce bruce <bruceb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I am stack between two identical systems (2U Twin2, 4 nodes, SuperMicro) > servers that have the same exact specs except for HDDs. These nodes will all > either have Asterisk installed with CentOS or will have Asterisk install in > virtual environment. > > Option 1: *12* x 3.5" HDD (3 HDDs per node) > Option 2: *24* x 2.5" HDD (6 HDDs per node) > **both options come to the same price. > > Other than the price difference (2.5" is more expensive and can't find many > of the 1TB or so....) is there any preference, advantage, or disadvatage of > chosing 2.5" HDD or 3.5" when it comes to the server operations or Asterisk > operation? > > Each node of this server will be running CentOS 5.5 either in 64 or 32 bit > + Asterisk or they will be used for virtual environment where multiple > instance of Asterisk will be installed within CentOS XEN. > > Your input is much appreciated. > > Thanks > > > They do say, in the west, that size matters. . . . .
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello
asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
